Search Results

There are 682856 results for: content related to: Static species distribution models in dynamically changing systems: how good can predictions really be?

  1. A new method for dealing with residual spatial autocorrelation in species distribution models

    Ecography

    Volume 35, Issue 10, October 2012, Pages: 879–888, Beth Crase, Adam C. Liedloff and Brendan A. Wintle

    Version of Record online : 16 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07138.x

  2. Evaluation of species distribution models by resampling of sites surveyed a century ago by Joseph Grinnell

    Ecography

    Volume 36, Issue 9, September 2013, Pages: 1017–1031, Adam B. Smith, Maria J. Santos, Michelle S. Koo, Karen M. C. Rowe, Kevin C. Rowe, James L. Patton, John D. Perrine, Steven R. Beissinger and Craig Moritz

    Version of Record online : 4 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00107.x

  3. Inferring the similarity of species distributions using Species’ Distribution Models

    Ecography

    Volume 37, Issue 2, February 2014, Pages: 130–136, William Godsoe

    Version of Record online : 4 SEP 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00403.x

  4. Uncertainty in predictions of range dynamics: black grouse climbing the Swiss Alps

    Ecography

    Volume 35, Issue 7, July 2012, Pages: 590–603, Damaris Zurell, Volker Grimm, Eva Rossmanith, Niklaus Zbinden, Niklaus E. Zimmermann and Boris Schröder

    Version of Record online : 16 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07200.x

  5. Are comparisons of species distribution models biased? Are they biologically meaningful?

    Ecography

    Volume 35, Issue 9, September 2012, Pages: 769–779, William Godsoe

    Version of Record online : 4 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07456.x

  6. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models

    Ecography

    Volume 32, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages: 66–77, Jane Elith and Catherine H. Graham

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05505.x

  7. How do species interactions affect species distribution models?

    Ecography

    Volume 35, Issue 9, September 2012, Pages: 811–820, William Godsoe and Luke J. Harmon

    Version of Record online : 20 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07103.x

  8. Forecasting the future of biodiversity: a test of single- and multi-species models for ants in North America

    Ecography

    Volume 34, Issue 5, October 2011, Pages: 836–847, Matthew C. Fitzpatrick, Nathan J. Sanders, Simon Ferrier, John T. Longino, Michael D. Weiser and Rob Dunn

    Version of Record online : 24 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06653.x

  9. You have free access to this content
    Native American impact on past forest composition inferred from species distribution models, Chautauqua County, New York

    Ecological Monographs

    Volume 85, Issue 4, November 2015, Pages: 557–581, Stephen J. Tulowiecki and Chris P. S. Larsen

    Version of Record online : 1 NOV 2015, DOI: 10.1890/14-2259.1

  10. Effects of ecohydrological variables on current and future ranges, local suitability patterns, and model accuracy in big sagebrush

    Ecography

    Volume 35, Issue 4, April 2012, Pages: 374–384, Daniel R. Schlaepfer, William K. Lauenroth and John B. Bradford

    Version of Record online : 21 SEP 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06928.x

  11. Differences in spatial predictions among species distribution modeling methods vary with species traits and environmental predictors

    Ecography

    Volume 32, Issue 6, December 2009, Pages: 907–918, Alexandra D. Syphard and Janet Franklin

    Version of Record online : 18 NOV 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05883.x

  12. Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling?

    Ecography

    Volume 37, Issue 2, February 2014, Pages: 191–203, Babak Naimi, Nicholas A. S. Hamm, Thomas A. Groen, Andrew K. Skidmore and Albertus G. Toxopeus

    Version of Record online : 4 SEP 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x

  13. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    The effect of a gradual response to the environment on species distribution modeling performance

    Ecography

    Volume 35, Issue 6, June 2012, Pages: 499–509, Christine N. Meynard and David M. Kaplan

    Version of Record online : 16 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07157.x

  14. Spatial range shape drives the grain size effects in species distribution models

    Ecography

    Volume 36, Issue 7, July 2013, Pages: 778–787, Christine Lauzeral, Gaël Grenouillet and Sébastien Brosse

    Version of Record online : 11 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07696.x

  15. Contribution of disturbance to distribution and abundance in a fire-adapted system

    Ecography

    Volume 35, Issue 4, April 2012, Pages: 348–355, Caroline M. Tucker, A. G. Rebelo and L. L. Manne

    Version of Record online : 26 SEP 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06948.x

  16. Botanical richness and endemicity patterns of Borneo derived from species distribution models

    Ecography

    Volume 32, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages: 180–192, Niels Raes, Marco C. Roos, J. W. Ferry Slik, E. Emiel Van Loon and Hans ter Steege

    Version of Record online : 24 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05800.x

  17. Species distribution models as a tool for forest management planning under climate change: risk evaluation of Abies alba in Bavaria

    Journal of Vegetation Science

    Volume 22, Issue 4, August 2011, Pages: 621–634, Wolfgang Falk and Karl H. Mellert

    Version of Record online : 28 APR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01294.x

  18. Ensemble modelling of species distribution: the effects of geographical and environmental ranges

    Ecography

    Volume 34, Issue 1, February 2011, Pages: 9–17, Gael Grenouillet, Laetitia Buisson, Nicolas Casajus and Sovan Lek

    Version of Record online : 8 JUL 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06152.x

  19. Climate-based empirical models show biased predictions of butterfly communities along environmental gradients

    Ecography

    Volume 35, Issue 8, August 2012, Pages: 684–692, Loïc Pellissier, Jean-Nicolas Pradervand, Julien Pottier, Anne Dubuis, Luigi Maiorano and Antoine Guisan

    Version of Record online : 1 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07047.x

  20. Selecting from correlated climate variables: a major source of uncertainty for predicting species distributions under climate change

    Ecography

    Volume 36, Issue 9, September 2013, Pages: 971–983, Veronika Braunisch, Joy Coppes, Raphaël Arlettaz, Rudi Suchant, Hans Schmid and Kurt Bollmann

    Version of Record online : 3 MAY 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00138.x