Search Results

There are 21571 results for: content related to: Roe deer may markedly alter forest nitrogen and phosphorus budgets across Europe

  1. Roe deer at risk: teasing apart habitat selection and landscape constraints in risk exposure at multiple scales

    Oikos

    Volume 124, Issue 11, November 2015, Pages: 1536–1546, Sophie Padié, Nicolas Morellet, A. J. Mark Hewison, Jean-Louis Martin, Nadège Bonnot, Bruno Cargnelutti and Simon Chamaillé-Jammes

    Version of Record online : 6 MAR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/oik.02115

  2. Can ungulates foraging in a multiple-use landscape alter forest nitrogen budgets?

    Oikos

    Volume 103, Issue 1, October 2003, Pages: 230–234, Steven W Seagle

    Version of Record online : 2 OCT 2003, DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12287.x

  3. Studying spatial interactions between sympatric populations of large herbivores: a null model approach

    Ecography

    Volume 36, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages: 157–165, Emmanuelle Richard, Clément Calenge, Sonia Saïd, Jean-Luc Hamann and Jean-Michel Gaillard

    Version of Record online : 22 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07604.x

  4. Global phylogeography of the genus Capreolus (Artiodactyla: Cervidae), a Palaearctic meso-mammal

    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

    Volume 170, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages: 209–221, Rita Lorenzini, Luisa Garofalo, Xuebo Qin, Inna Voloshina and Sandro Lovari

    Version of Record online : 18 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12091

  5. Feeding patterns by roe deer and rabbits on pine, willow and birch in relation to spatial arrangement

    Oikos

    Volume 109, Issue 3, June 2005, Pages: 513–520, M. Bergman, G. R. Iason and A. J. Hester

    Version of Record online : 17 MAR 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13794.x

  6. Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats

    Mammal Review

    Volume 28, Issue 4, December 1998, Pages: 141–164, R. J. Putman and N. P. Moore

    Version of Record online : 1 MAY 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2907.1998.00031.x

  7. Migration in geographic and ecological space by a large herbivore

    Ecological Monographs

    Volume 87, Issue 2, May 2017, Pages: 297–320, Wibke Peters, Mark Hebblewhite, Atle Mysterud, Derek Spitz, Stefano Focardi, Ferdinando Urbano, Nicolas Morellet, Marco Heurich, Petter Kjellander, John D. C. Linnell and Francesca Cagnacci

    Version of Record online : 23 MAR 2017, DOI: 10.1002/ecm.1250

  8. Using a proxy of plant productivity (NDVI) to find key periods for animal performance: the case of roe deer

    Oikos

    Volume 112, Issue 3, March 2006, Pages: 565–572, Nathalie Pettorelli, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Atle Mysterud, Patrick Duncan, Nils Chr. Stenseth, Daniel Delorme, Guy Van Laere, Carole Toïgo and Francois Klein

    Version of Record online : 23 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14447.x

  9. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Roe deer face competing risks between predators along a gradient in abundance

    Ecosphere

    Volume 4, Issue 9, September 2013, Pages: 1–12, Claudia Melis, Erlend B. Nilsen, Manuela Panzacchi, John D.C. Linnell and John Odden

    Version of Record online : 25 SEP 2013, DOI: 10.1890/ES13-00099.1

  10. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Predicting the potential demographic impact of predators on their prey: a comparative analysis of two carnivore–ungulate systems in Scandinavia

    Journal of Animal Ecology

    Volume 81, Issue 2, March 2012, Pages: 443–454, Vincenzo Gervasi, Erlend B. Nilsen, Håkan Sand, Manuela Panzacchi, Geir R. Rauset, Hans C. Pedersen, Jonas Kindberg, Petter Wabakken, Barbara Zimmermann, John Odden, Olof Liberg, Jon E. Swenson and John D. C. Linnell

    Version of Record online : 11 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01928.x

  11. Identifying threshold densities for wild deer in the UK above which negative impacts may occur

    Mammal Review

    Volume 41, Issue 3, July 2011, Pages: 175–196, Rory PUTMAN, Jochen LANGBEIN, Peter GREEN and Peter WATSON

    Version of Record online : 31 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00173.x

  12. Correlations of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer densities in Scottish forests with environmental variables

    Journal of Zoology

    Volume 242, Issue 4, August 1997, Pages: 681–704, J. Latham, B. W. Staines and M. L. Gorman

    Version of Record online : 14 MAY 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb05820.x

  13. Reproductive constraints, not environmental conditions, shape the ontogeny of sex-specific mass–size allometry in roe deer

    Oikos

    Volume 120, Issue 8, August 2011, Pages: 1217–1226, A. J. Mark Hewison, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Daniel Delorme, Guy Van Laere, Thibaut Amblard and François Klein

    Version of Record online : 14 MAR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19316.x

  14. Temporal variation in habitat selection breaks the catch-22 of spatially contrasting predation risk from multiple predators

    Oikos

    Volume 126, Issue 5, May 2017, Pages: 624–632, Karen Lone, Atle Mysterud, Terje Gobakken, John Odden, John Linnell and Leif Egil Loe

    Version of Record online : 25 OCT 2016, DOI: 10.1111/oik.03486

  15. Living and dying in a multi-predator landscape of fear: roe deer are squeezed by contrasting pattern of predation risk imposed by lynx and humans

    Oikos

    Volume 123, Issue 6, June 2014, Pages: 641–651, Karen Lone, Leif Egil Loe, Terje Gobakken, John D. C. Linnell, John Odden, Jørgen Remmen and Atle Mysterud

    Version of Record online : 14 JAN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00938.x

  16. Landscape fragmentation influences winter body mass of roe deer

    Ecography

    Volume 32, Issue 6, December 2009, Pages: 1062–1070, A.J. Mark Hewison, Nicolas Morellet, Helene Verheyden, Tanguy Daufresne, Jean-Marc Angibault, Bruno Cargnelutti, Joel Merlet, Denis Picot, Jean-Luc Rames, Jean Joachim, Bruno Lourtet, Emmanuel Serrano, Eric Bideau and Nicolas Cebe

    Version of Record online : 28 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05888.x

  17. Predation by wolves (Canis lupus) on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in north-eastern Apennine, Italy

    Journal of Zoology

    Volume 264, Issue 3, November 2004, Pages: 249–258, L. Mattioli, C. Capitani, E. Avanzinelli, I. Bertelli, A. Gazzola and M. Apollonio

    Version of Record online : 28 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1017/S095283690400576X

  18. Antlers–bones of contention

    Mammal Review

    Volume 5, Issue 4, December 1975, Pages: 121–172, D. I. CHAPMAN

    Version of Record online : 10 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1975.tb00194.x

  19. Seasonal differences between moose and roe deer in ability to digest browse

    Ecography

    Volume 4, Issue 1, February 1981, Pages: 59–65, Göran Cederlund and Anders Nyström

    Version of Record online : 30 JUN 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1981.tb00981.x

  20. Assessing the intensity of sexual selection on male body mass and antler length in roe deer Capreolus capreolus: is bigger better in a weakly dimorphic species?

    Oikos

    Volume 119, Issue 9, September 2010, Pages: 1484–1492, Cécile Vanpé, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Petter Kjellander, Olof Liberg, Daniel Delorme and A. J. Mark Hewison

    Version of Record online : 30 MAR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18312.x