Search Results

There are 27204 results for: content related to: Eminent Domain and the Psychology of Property Rights: Proposed Use, Subjective Attachment, and Taker Identity

  1. “Not Imminent in My Domain!” County Leaders’ Attitudes toward Eminent Domain Decisions

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 70, Issue 6, November/December 2010, Pages: 885–893, Michele M. Hoyman and Jamie R. McCall

    Version of Record online : 26 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02220.x

  2. Outrage and Engage: A Story of Eminent Domain

    Journal of Legal Studies Education

    Volume 31, Issue 1, Winter 2014, Pages: 55–87, Patricia Pattison

    Version of Record online : 26 JAN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jlse.12009

  3. EMINENT DOMAIN: UNUSED TOOL FOR AMERICAN LABOR?

    WorkingUSA

    Volume 10, Issue 2, June 2007, Pages: 193–208, Peter Ranis

    Version of Record online : 7 JUN 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-4580.2007.00151.x

  4. The impact of bargaining delays under the threat of eminent domain

    Journal of Regional Science

    Javier E. Portillo

    Version of Record online : 26 SEP 2017, DOI: 10.1111/jors.12363

  5. Private takings

    Journal of Public Economic Theory

    Volume 19, Issue 3, June 2017, Pages: 639–657, Alessandro Marchesiani and Ed Nosal

    Version of Record online : 7 FEB 2017, DOI: 10.1111/jpet.12235

  6. Kelo v. City of New London: An Ideal Case to Teach Ethical and Legal Principles

    Journal of Legal Studies Education

    Volume 25, Issue 2, Summer/Fall 2008, Pages: 343–355, Lamar Odom and Analco González

    Version of Record online : 2 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1722.2008.00056.x

  7. Property Rights and the Common Good

    Hastings Center Report

    Volume 36, Issue 5, September-October 2006, Pages: 10–11, Lawrence O. Gostin

    Version of Record online : 8 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2006.0076

  8. An Empirical Study of Court-Adjudicated Takings Compensation in New York City: 1990–2003

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue 2, June 2011, Pages: 384–412, Yun-chien Chang

    Version of Record online : 12 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01213.x

  9. PROPERTY RIGHTS LEGISLATION AND THE POLICE POWER

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 37, Issue 3, March 2000, Pages: 527–562, LYNDA J. OSWALD

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2000.tb00277.x

  10. The Radiant University: Space, Urban Redevelopment, and the Public Good

    City & Society

    Volume 25, Issue 1, April 2013, Pages: 47–69, STEVEN GREGORY

    Version of Record online : 26 APR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/ciso.12011

  11. THE “PUBLIC USE” REQUIREMENT AFTER MIDKIFF

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 24, Issue 4, December 1987, Pages: 621–641, MICHAEL B. BIXBY

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1986.tb01591.x

  12. Managing Incentive Dynamics for Collaborative Governance in Land and Ecological Conservation

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 74, Issue 2, March/April 2014, Pages: 220–231, Ching-Ping Tang and Shui-Yan Tang

    Version of Record online : 6 MAR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/puar.12190

  13. Rufus W. Peckham and the Pursuit of Economic Freedom

    Journal of Supreme Court History

    Volume 37, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 22–41, JAMES W. ELY JR.

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5818.2012.01281.x

  14. The Participant's Dilemma: Bringing Conflict and Representation Back In

    International Journal of Urban and Regional Research

    Volume 34, Issue 3, September 2010, Pages: 496–511, DEBBIE BECHER

    Version of Record online : 28 JUL 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00965.x

  15. The Fuller Court and Takings Jurisprudence

    Journal of Supreme Court History

    Volume 21, Issue 2, December 1996, Pages: 120–135, James W. Ely Jr.

    Version of Record online : 18 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5818.1996.tb00053.x

  16. TREATING THE LEGAL SIDE EFFECTS OF CIPRO®: ARE EVALUATION OF COMPENSATION RULES FOR GOVERNMENT TAKINGS OF PATENT RIGHTS

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 40, Issue 1, September 2002, Pages: 125–175, Daniel R. Cahoy

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2002.tb00912.x

  17. Contesting the U.S. Constitution through State Amendments: The 2011 and 2012 Elections

    Political Science Quarterly

    Volume 129, Issue 1, Spring 2014, Pages: 55–85, Sean Beienburg

    Version of Record online : 21 MAR 2014, DOI: 10.1002/polq.12146

  18. WATER RIGHTS, EMINENT DOMAIN, AND THE PUBLIC TRUST

    JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association

    Volume 13, Issue 4, August 1977, Pages: 747–757, George E. Radosevich and Melvin B. Sabey

    Version of Record online : 8 JUN 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1977.tb02058.x

  19. EMINENT DOMAIN

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 5, Issue 2, September 1967, Pages: 143–154, JOHN WILCOX

    Version of Record online : 22 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1967.tb01057.x

  20. Eminent Domain: Does BB&T's Lending Policy Reflect Sound Corporate Governance?

    Business and Society Review

    Volume 113, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 91–97, THOMAS A. HEMPHILL

    Version of Record online : 28 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00314.x