Search Results

There are 8752 results for: content related to: Judge-Jury Difference in Punitive Damages Awards: Who Listens to the Supreme Court?

  1. The Judicial Treatment of Noneconomic Compensatory Damages in the 19th Century

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 4, Issue 2, July 2007, Pages: 365–399, Ronald J. Allen and Alexia Brunet

    Version of Record online : 18 JUN 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00092.x

  2. Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: Empirical Analyses Using the Civil Justice Survey of State Courts 1992, 1996, and 2001 Data

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2006, Pages: 263–295, Theodore Eisenberg, Paula L. Hannaford-Agor, Michael Heise, Neil LaFountain, G. Thomas Munsterman, Brian Ostrom and Martin T. Wells

    Version of Record online : 21 JUN 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00070.x

  3. Shifting the Fat-Tailed Distribution of Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awards

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 11, Issue 2, June 2014, Pages: 350–377, W. Kip Viscusi and Benjamin J. McMichael

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12043

  4. The Effects of “Early Offers” in Medical Malpractice Cases: Evidence from Texas

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 6, Issue 4, December 2009, Pages: 723–767, Bernard Black, David A. Hyman and Charles Silver

    Version of Record online : 15 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01158.x

  5. Do Defendants Pay What Juries Award? Post-Verdict Haircuts in Texas Medical Malpractice Cases, 1988–2003

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2007, Pages: 3–68, David A. Hyman, Bernard Black, Kathryn Zeiler, Charles Silver and William M. Sage

    Version of Record online : 21 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00081.x

  6. Addressing the Zeros Problem: Regression Models for Outcomes with a Large Proportion of Zeros, with an Application to Trial Outcomes

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 12, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages: 161–186, Theodore Eisenberg, Thomas Eisenberg, Martin T. Wells and Min Zhang

    Version of Record online : 18 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12068

  7. The Punitive Damages Calculus: The Differential Incidence of State Punitive Damages Reforms

    Southern Economic Journal

    Volume 84, Issue 1, July 2017, Pages: 82–97, Benjamin J. McMichael and W. Kip Viscusi

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2017, DOI: 10.1002/soej.12217

  8. Settlement at Policy Limits and the Duty to Settle: Evidence from Texas

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue 1, March 2011, Pages: 48–84, David A. Hyman, Bernard Black and Charles Silver

    Version of Record online : 17 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01207.x

  9. Does Tort Law Deter Individuals? A Behavioral Science Study

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 9, Issue 3, September 2012, Pages: 567–603, W. Jonathan Cardi, Randall D. Penfield and Albert H. Yoon

    Version of Record online : 23 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01263.x

  10. MCBRIDE V. GENERAL MOTORS: JUDICIAL RESPONSE TO CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES IN A PRODUCTS LIABILITY PUNITIVE DAMAGE LIMITATION STATUTE

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 29, Issue 3, September 1991, Pages: 367–411, WILLIAM H. VOLZ and MICHAEL C. FAYZ

    Version of Record online : 22 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1991.tb00639.x

  11. To Dollars from Sense: Qualitative to Quantitative Translation in Jury Damage Awards

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue s1, December 2011, Pages: 120–147, Valerie P. Hans and Valerie F. Reyna

    Version of Record online : 22 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01233.x

  12. THE DETERMINANTS OF STATE-LEVEL CAPS ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES: THEORY AND EVIDENCE

    Contemporary Economic Policy

    Volume 31, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 110–125, THOMAS J. MICELI and MICHAEL P. STONE

    Version of Record online : 13 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00297.x

  13. DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ARBITRAL PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARDS

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 32, Issue 4, February 1996, Pages: 583–626, KENNETH R. DAVIS

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1995.tb01539.x

  14. Assuring Civil Damages Adequately Deter: A Public Good Experiment

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 11, Issue 2, June 2014, Pages: 301–349, Theodore Eisenberg and Christoph Engel

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12042

  15. Community Characteristics and Tort Law: The Importance of County Demographic Composition and Inequality to Tort Trial Outcomes

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue 2, June 2011, Pages: 413–447, Issa Kohler-Hausmann

    Version of Record online : 12 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01214.x

  16. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Liability Survey: Inaccurate, Unfair, and Bad for Business

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 6, Issue 4, December 2009, Pages: 969–1002, Theodore Eisenberg

    Version of Record online : 30 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01155.x

  17. Dissecting Damages: An Empirical Exploration of Sexual Harassment Awards

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages: 1–45, Catherine M. Sharkey

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00061.x

  18. Predictors of verdict and punitive damages in high-stakes civil litigation

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 26, Issue 2, March/April 2008, Pages: 167–186, Katherine V. Vinson, Mark A. Costanzo and Dale E. Berger, Ph.D.

    Version of Record online : 14 MAR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.807

  19. Medical malpractice and sarcoma care—A thirty-three year review of case resolutions, inciting factors, and at risk physician specialties surrounding a rare diagnosis

    Journal of Surgical Oncology

    Volume 110, Issue 8, December 15, 2014, Pages: 919–929, Nathan W. Mesko, Jennifer L. Mesko, Lauren M. Gaffney, Jennifer L. Halpern, Herbert S. Schwartz and Ginger E. Holt

    Version of Record online : 22 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1002/jso.23770

  20. Should punitive damages be part of the judicial arsenal in contract cases?

    Legal Studies

    Volume 26, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages: 369–393, Ralph Cunnington

    Version of Record online : 23 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00016.x