Search Results

There are 98849 results for: content related to: Judging Women

  1. Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 45, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages: 1027–1061, Ryan J. Owens and Justin P. Wedeking

    Version of Record online : 8 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00464.x

  2. Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 51, Issue 4, October 2007, Pages: 890–905, Chris W. Bonneau, Thomas H. Hammond, Forrest Maltzman and Paul J. Wahlbeck

    Version of Record online : 2 OCT 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00287.x

  3. Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 48, Issue 1, January 2004, Pages: 123–137, Virginia A. Hettinger, Stefanie A. Lindquist and Wendy L. Martinek

    Version of Record online : 12 DEC 2003, DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00060.x

  4. The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, December 2015, Pages: 917–944, Paul M. Collins Jr., Pamela C. Corley and Jesse Hamner

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12166

  5. Gender, Race, and Dissensus on State Supreme Courts

    Social Science Quarterly

    Volume 96, Issue 2, June 2015, Pages: 553–575, John Szmer, Robert K. Christensen and Erin B. Kaheny

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12133

  6. The Spiral of Silence and Fear of Isolation

    Journal of Communication

    Volume 57, Issue 3, September 2007, Pages: 450–468, Kurt Neuwirth, Edward Frederick and Charles Mayo

    Version of Record online : 13 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00352.x

  7. Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 5, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 143–170, Paul M. Collins Jr.

    Version of Record online : 4 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00121.x

  8. Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 56, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages: 400–412, Cliff Carrubba, Barry Friedman, Andrew D. Martin and Georg Vanberg

    Version of Record online : 21 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00557.x

  9. You have free access to this content
    Selective Posting: Willingness to post a message online

    Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

    Volume 16, Issue 2, January 2011, Pages: 201–227, Gi Woong Yun and Sung-Yeon Park

    Version of Record online : 13 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01533.x

  10. Debunking Douglas: The case against writing both majority and minority opinions

    Journal of Supreme Court History

    Volume 39, Issue 2, July 2014, Pages: 227–245, Craig Alan Smith

    Version of Record online : 23 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5818.2014.12043.x

  11. The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 10, Issue 2, June 2013, Pages: 325–358, Ryan C. Black and James F. Spriggs II

    Version of Record online : 18 APR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12012

  12. Case Study: Using the Supreme Court's Affordable Care Act Decision to Introduce Judicial Review Philosophies in a Legal Environment Course

    Journal of Legal Studies Education

    Volume 30, Issue 2, Summer/Fall 2013, Pages: 321–345, Jennifer L. Chapman*

    Version of Record online : 21 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jlse.12004

  13. Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 54, Issue 4, October 2010, Pages: 871–890, Tom S. Clark and Benjamin Lauderdale

    Version of Record online : 21 JUL 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00470.x

  14. The Burger Court and the conflict over the rational basis test: The untold story of Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v. Murgia

    Journal of Supreme Court History

    Volume 39, Issue 2, July 2014, Pages: 264–285, Earl M. Maltz

    Version of Record online : 23 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5818.2014.12046.x

  15. Splitting the Difference: Modeling Appellate Court Decisions with Mixed Outcomes

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 41, Issue 2, June 2007, Pages: 429–456, Stefanie A. Lindquist, Wendy L. Martinek and Virginia A. Hettinger

    Version of Record online : 18 MAY 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00303.x

  16. The Use of Rhetorical Sources by the U.S. Supreme Court

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 40, Issue 4, December 2006, Pages: 817–844, Robert J. Hume

    Version of Record online : 28 NOV 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00282.x

  17. THE INCREMENTAL STRENGTHENING OF FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION FOR COMMERCIAL SPEECH: LESSONS FROM GREATER NEW ORLEANS BROADCASTING

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 37, Issue 4, June 2000, Pages: 587–652, ARLEN W. LANGVARDT

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2000.tb00280.x

  18. Justices Douglas and Whittaker in Meyer v. United States: A false claim rebutted

    Journal of Supreme Court History

    Volume 40, Issue 2, July 2014, Pages: 172–186, David J. Danelski

    Version of Record online : 1 JUL 2015, DOI: 10.1111/jsch.12072

  19. The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 54, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages: 412–427, Ryan J. Owens

    Version of Record online : 9 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00438.x

  20. AN UNREASONABLE ARGUMENT AGAINST STUDENT FREE SPEECH

    Educational Theory

    Volume 59, Issue 2, May 2009, Pages: 123–143, David Blacker

    Version of Record online : 28 MAY 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00310.x