Search Results

There are 19449 results for: content related to: Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel

  1. Does the Law Matter? Win Rates and Law Reforms

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 11, Issue 2, June 2014, Pages: 378–407, David Gliksberg

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12044

  2. Does the Judge Matter? Exploiting Random Assignment on a Court of Last Resort to Assess Judge and Case Selection Effects

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 9, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages: 246–290, Theodore Eisenberg, Talia Fisher and Issi Rosen-Zvi

    Version of Record online : 7 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01253.x

  3. Deciding Not to Decide: The Politics of Recusals on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 48, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages: 621–655, Robert J. Hume

    Version of Record online : 27 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12090

  4. The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 54, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages: 412–427, Ryan J. Owens

    Version of Record online : 9 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00438.x

  5. Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 45, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages: 1027–1061, Ryan J. Owens and Justin P. Wedeking

    Version of Record online : 8 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00464.x

  6. The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking: A Study of Conflict Cases

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 40, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages: 135–162, Stefanie A. Lindquist and David E. Klein

    Version of Record online : 16 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00262.x

  7. Does Seniority Matter? The Conditional Influence of State Methods of Judicial Retention

    Social Science Quarterly

    Volume 91, Issue 1, March 2010, Pages: 209–227, Brent D. Boyea

    Version of Record online : 11 JAN 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00689.x

  8. Does Chevron Matter?

    Law & Policy

    Volume 28, Issue 4, October 2006, Pages: 444–469, MARK J. RICHARDS, JOSEPH L. SMITH and HERBERT M. KRITZER

    Version of Record online : 7 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00234.x

  9. Many Voices, One Court: The Origin and Role of Dissent in the Supreme Court

    Journal of Supreme Court History

    Volume 36, Issue 3, November 2011, Pages: 193–215, PETER BOZZO, SHIMMY EDWARDS and APRIL A. CHRISTINE

    Version of Record online : 21 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5818.2011.01271.x

  10. Government and Individual Liberty: The Rehnquist Court's Stop and Frisk Decisions

    Politics & Policy

    Volume 37, Issue 6, December 2009, Pages: 1235–1280, MARC G. PUFONG and CHARLES KLUBALL

    Version of Record online : 30 NOV 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00219.x

  11. Birth Order, Preferences, and Norms on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, December 2015, Pages: 945–972, Kevin T. McGuire

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12169

  12. Reconsidering the Impact of Jurisprudential Regimes

    Social Science Quarterly

    Volume 87, Issue 2, June 2006, Pages: 380–394, Kevin M. Scott

    Version of Record online : 9 MAY 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00386.x

  13. Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme Court

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 9, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 129–148, Paul H. Edelman, David E. Klein and Stefanie A. Lindquist

    Version of Record online : 15 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01249.x

  14. Passing and Strategic Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 39, Issue 2, June 2005, Pages: 349–378, Timothy R. Johnson, James F. Spriggs II and Paul J. Wahlbeck

    Version of Record online : 24 MAY 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.0023-9216.2005.00085.x

  15. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Supreme Court Justices’ Economic Behaviour: A Multilevel Model Analysis

    Scandinavian Political Studies

    Volume 39, Issue 1, March 2016, Pages: 73–94, Jon Kåre Skiple, Gunnar Grendstad, William R. Shaffer and Eric N. Waltenburg

    Version of Record online : 22 DEC 2015, DOI: 10.1111/1467-9477.12060

  16. Gender, Race, and Dissensus on State Supreme Courts

    Social Science Quarterly

    Volume 96, Issue 2, June 2015, Pages: 553–575, John Szmer, Robert K. Christensen and Erin B. Kaheny

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12133

  17. Is Certiorari Contingent on Litigant Behavior? Petitioners' Role in Strategic Auditing

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 10, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages: 54–75, Maxwell Mak, Andrew H. Sidman and Udi Sommer

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12002

  18. Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 5, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 143–170, Paul M. Collins Jr.

    Version of Record online : 4 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00121.x

  19. Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 51, Issue 4, October 2007, Pages: 890–905, Chris W. Bonneau, Thomas H. Hammond, Forrest Maltzman and Paul J. Wahlbeck

    Version of Record online : 2 OCT 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00287.x

  20. Law Clerks and Their Influence at the US Supreme Court: Comments on Recent Works by Peppers and Ward

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 39, Issue 3, Summer 2014, Pages: 741–757, Mark C. Miller

    Version of Record online : 22 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12074