Search Results

There are 309353 results for: content related to: THROUGH A DIFFERENT LENS: USING FILM TO TEACH FAMILY LAW

  1. The Non-Subversive Function of European Private Law: The Case of Harmonisation of Family Law

    European Law Journal

    Volume 12, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages: 78–105, Maria Rosaria Marella

    Version of Record online : 26 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00308.x

  2. THE FAMILY LAW EDUCATION REFORM PROJECT FINAL REPORT

    Family Court Review

    Volume 44, Issue 4, October 2006, Pages: 524–570, Mary E. O’Connell and J. Herbie DiFonzo

    Version of Record online : 11 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00107.x

  3. CYBER-ABUSE—A NEW WORLDWIDE THREAT TO CHILDREN'S RIGHTS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 48, Issue 3, July 2010, Pages: 459–481, Tom Altobelli

    Version of Record online : 23 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01323.x

  4. HOFSTRA'S FAMILY LAW WITH SKILLS COURSE: IMPLEMENTING FLER (THE FAMILY LAW EDUCATION REFORM PROJECT)

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 685–699, Andrew Schepard and J. Herbie DiFonzo

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01405.x

  5. REEVALUATING WHERE WE STAND: A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY OF AMERICA'S FAMILY JUSTICE SYSTEMS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 46, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages: 230–257, Barbara A. Babb

    Version of Record online : 19 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00197.x

  6. USING STATE LEGAL NEEDS STUDIES TO INCREASE ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR LOW-INCOME FAMILIES

    Family Court Review

    Volume 48, Issue 4, October 2010, Pages: 619–630, Monica A. Fennell

    Version of Record online : 20 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01337.x

  7. NO MORE CASEBOOKS: USING SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING TO EDUCATE FUTURE FAMILY LAW PRACTITIONERS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 700–710, Susan B. Apel

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01406.x

  8. JURISDICTION FRICTION AND THE FRUSTRATION OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION: WHY INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION CASES SHOULD BE HEARD EXCLUSIVELY BY FEDERAL COURTS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages: 170–189, Eric Lesh

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01360.x

  9. THE BEST SEAT IN THE HOUSE: THE COURT ASSIGNMENT AND JUDICIAL SATISFACTION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 47, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages: 209–238, Deborah Chase and Hon. Peggy Fulton Hora

    Version of Record online : 13 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01250.x

  10. CHILD RELOCATION: AN INTRACTABLE INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW PROBLEM

    Family Court Review

    Volume 45, Issue 2, April 2007, Pages: 214–246, The Hon. Justice Tim Carmody

    Version of Record online : 12 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00140.x

  11. FUNCTIONAL PARENTING AND DYSFUNCTIONAL ABORTION POLICY: REFORMING PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT LEGISLATION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 50, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages: 241–257, Maya Manian

    Version of Record online : 20 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01448.x

  12. MAKING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) LESS ALTERNATIVE: THE NEED FOR ADR AS BOTH A MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENT AND A BAR EXAM TOPIC

    Family Court Review

    Volume 44, Issue 4, October 2006, Pages: 640–657, Dori Cohen

    Version of Record online : 11 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00116.x

  13. A FAMILY LAW PERSPECTIVE ON PARENTAL INCARCERATION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 50, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages: 228–240, Sarah Abramowicz

    Version of Record online : 20 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01447.x

  14. A BETTER BEGINNING: FAMILY LAW IN THE FIRST YEAR OF LAW SCHOOL

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 711–714, Wanda M. Temm

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01407.x

  15. FAMILIES, COURTS, AND THE END OF LIFE: SCHIAVO AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FAMILY JUSTICE SYSTEM

    Family Court Review

    Volume 46, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages: 297–330, Judith D. Moran

    Version of Record online : 19 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00202.x

  16. FAMILY LAW EDUCATION REFORM: PROGRESS AND INNOVATION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 675–677, Barbara Glesner Fines

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01403.x

  17. USING EXTERNSHIPS TO INTRODUCE FAMILY LAW STUDENTS TO NEW PROFESSIONAL ROLES

    Family Court Review

    Volume 43, Issue 1, January 2005, Pages: 137–148, Nancy Ver Steegh

    Version of Record online : 18 FEB 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00013.x

  18. WHAT FAMILY LAWYERS ARE REALLY DOING WHEN THEY NEGOTIATE

    Family Court Review

    Volume 44, Issue 4, October 2006, Pages: 612–622, Andrea Kupfer Schneider and Nancy Mills

    Version of Record online : 11 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00114.x

  19. THE SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE BENCH AND BAR

    Family Court Review

    Volume 48, Issue 4, October 2010, Pages: 607–618, Hon. Randall T. Shepard

    Version of Record online : 20 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01336.x

  20. PARENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN FAMILY COURTS: BALANCING AUTONOMY AND STATE INTERVENTION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages: 140–154, Shelley Kierstead

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01358.x