Search Results

There are 1868 results for: content related to: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence

  1. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects

    Allergy

    Volume 57, Issue s70, February 2002, Pages: 5–39, Ole Hilberg

    Version of Record online : 20 FEB 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.0908-665x.2001.all.doc.x

  2. Objective evidence for the efficacy of surgical management of the deviated septum as a treatment for chronic nasal obstruction: a systematic review

    Clinical Otolaryngology

    Volume 36, Issue 2, April 2011, Pages: 106–113, M. Moore and R. Eccles

    Version of Record online : 25 APR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02279.x

  3. The effects of disclosure of sequential rhinomanometry scores on post-septoplasty subjective scores of nasal obstruction: a randomised controlled trial

    Clinical Otolaryngology

    Volume 37, Issue 3, June 2012, Pages: 176–180, D. Manestar, T. Braut, M. Kujundžić, G. Malvić, M. Velepič, I. Donadić Manestar, D. Matanić Lender and R. Starčević

    Version of Record online : 19 JUN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02490.x

  4. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and the amount of nasal secretion in the clinical monitoring of the nasal provocation test

    Clinical & Experimental Allergy

    Volume 28, Issue 4, April 1998, Pages: 468–477, PirilÄ and Nuutinen

    Version of Record online : 25 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00247.x

  5. The importance of side difference in nasal obstruction and rhinomanometry: a retrospective correlation of symptoms and rhinomanometry in 1000 patients

    Clinical Otolaryngology

    Volume 37, Issue 1, February 2012, Pages: 17–22, H.L. Thulesius, A. Cervin and M. Jessen

    Version of Record online : 21 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02420.x

  6. Reliable and reproducible anterior active rhinomanometry for the assessment of unilateral nasal resistance

    Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences

    Volume 25, Issue 6, December 2000, Pages: 499–503, A.S. Carney, N.D. Bateman and N.S. Jones

    Version of Record online : 25 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00384.x

  7. You have free access to this content
    Measurements of nasal airflow and patency: a critical review with emphasis on the use of peak nasal inspiratory flow in daily practice

    Allergy

    Volume 71, Issue 2, February 2016, Pages: 162–174, G. Ottaviano and W. J. Fokkens

    Version of Record online : 20 JAN 2016, DOI: 10.1111/all.12778

  8. Importance to question sinonasal symptoms and to perform rhinoscopy and rhinomanometry in cystic fibrosis patients

    Pediatric Pulmonology

    Volume 52, Issue 2, February 2017, Pages: 167–174, J.M. Bock, M. Schien, C. Fischer, L. Naehrlich, M. Kaeding, O. Guntinas-Lichius, A. Gerber, C. Arnold and J.G. Mainz

    Version of Record online : 28 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1002/ppul.23613

  9. What is normal nasal airflow? A computational study of 22 healthy adults

    International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology

    Volume 4, Issue 6, June 2014, Pages: 435–446, Kai Zhao and Jianbo Jiang

    Version of Record online : 24 MAR 2014, DOI: 10.1002/alr.21319

  10. The association of subjective nasal patency with peak inspiratory nasal flow in a large healthy population

    Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences

    Volume 28, Issue 4, August 2003, Pages: 352–354, J. Jose and S.R. Ell

    Version of Record online : 21 JUL 2003, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00722.x

  11. You have free access to this content
    Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold

    Intervention Review

    The Cochrane Library

    Laura Deckx, An IM De Sutter, Linda Guo, Nabiel A Mir and Mieke L van Driel

    Published Online : 17 OCT 2016, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009612.pub2

  12. Reproducibility of nasal function measurements with histamine and adenosine monophosphate nasal challenge testing in patients with allergic rhinitis

    Allergology International

    Volume 52, Issue 3, September 2003, Pages: 155–160, Andrew M Wilson, Linda C Orr, Fiona Robb, Erika J Sims and Brian J Lipworth

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1592.2003.00294.x

  13. Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency

    The Laryngoscope

    Volume 124, Issue 3, March 2014, Pages: 589–595, Kai Zhao, Jianbo Jiang, Kara Blacker, Brian Lyman, Pamela Dalton, Beverly J. Cowart and Edmund A. Pribitkin

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2013, DOI: 10.1002/lary.24265

  14. Evidence for correlation of objective and subjective measures of nasal airflow in patients with common cold

    Clinical Otolaryngology

    Volume 30, Issue 1, February 2005, Pages: 35–38, J.D. Clarke, M.L. Hopkins and R. Eccles

    Version of Record online : 3 MAR 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00915.x

  15. Usefulness of rhinomanometry in the identification and treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: an algorithm for predicting the relationship between nasal resistance and continuous positive airway pressure. a retrospective study

    Clinical Otolaryngology

    Volume 41, Issue 6, December 2016, Pages: 750–757, J. Hueto, F. Santaolalla, A. Sanchez-del-Rey and A. Martinez-Ibargüen

    Version of Record online : 10 MAR 2016, DOI: 10.1111/coa.12639

  16. Optical rhinometry: Application on children and adolescents for nasal provocation tests

    Pediatric Allergy and Immunology

    Volume 18, Issue 5, August 2007, Pages: 372–377, Holger Mittenzwey, Eike Gunther Wüstenberg and Wolfgang Leupold

    Version of Record online : 6 JUL 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00530.x

  17. You have free access to this content
    Evaluation of nasal patency by visual analogue scale/nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaires and anterior active rhinomanometry after septoplasty: a retrospective one-year follow-up cohort study

    Clinical Otolaryngology

    Volume 42, Issue 1, February 2017, Pages: 53–59, H.C. Hsu, C.D. Tan, C.W. Chang, C.W. Chu, Y.C. Chiu, C.J. Pan and H.M. Huang

    Version of Record online : 31 MAY 2016, DOI: 10.1111/coa.12662

  18. Paradoxical increase in nasal airway resistance after topical nasal decongestion – does it really exist? A retro- and prospective study

    Clinical Otolaryngology

    Volume 41, Issue 6, December 2016, Pages: 689–693, S. Swoboda, H.L. Thulesius and M. Jessen

    Version of Record online : 19 FEB 2016, DOI: 10.1111/coa.12592

  19. You have free access to this content
    Evidence-based recommendations regarding the differential diagnosis and assessment of nasal congestion: using the new GRADE system

    Allergy

    Volume 63, Issue 7, July 2008, Pages: 820–833, E. Van Spronsen, K. J. A. O. Ingels, A. H. Jansen, K. Graamans and W. J. Fokkens

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01729.x

  20. Study and application of a mathematical model for the provisional assessment of areas and nasal resistance, obtained using acoustic rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry

    Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences

    Volume 26, Issue 4, 2001, Pages: 286–293, G. Zambetti, M. Moresi, R. Romeo and F. Filiaci

    Version of Record online : 9 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2001.00470.x