Search Results

There are 25904 results for: content related to: Rater training revisited: An updated meta-analytic review of frame-of-reference training

  1. Evidence for the Effectiveness of an Alternative Multisource Performance Rating Methodology

    Personnel Psychology

    Volume 65, Issue 3, Autumn 2012, Pages: 531–563, Brian J. Hoffman, C. Allen Gorman, Carrie A. Blair, John P. Meriac, Benjamin Overstreet and E. Kate Atchley

    Version of Record online : 2 AUG 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01252.x

  2. Frame of reference rater training issues: recall, time and behavior observation training

    International Journal of Training and Development

    Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2003, Pages: 93–107, Sylvia G. Roch and Brian J. O'Sullivan

    Version of Record online : 3 JUL 2003, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2419.00174

  3. Rater training: Understanding effects of training content, practice ratings, and feedback

    International Journal of Selection and Assessment

    Volume 25, Issue 3, September 2017, Pages: 253–266, Neil M. A. Hauenstein and Maureen E. McCusker

    Version of Record online : 4 AUG 2017, DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12177

  4. Comparing the Effectiveness of Self-Paced and Collaborative Frame-of-Reference Training on Rater Accuracy in a Large-Scale Writing Assessment

    Journal of Educational Measurement

    Volume 52, Issue 3, Fall 2015, Pages: 301–318, Kevin R. Raczynski, Allan S. Cohen, George Engelhard Jr. and Zhenqiu Lu

    Version of Record online : 1 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12079

  5. IS MORE STRUCTURE REALLY BETTER? A COMPARISON OF FRAME-OF-REFERENCE TRAINING AND DESCRIPTIVELY ANCHORED RATING SCALES TO IMPROVE INTERVIEWERS’ RATING QUALITY

    Personnel Psychology

    Volume 64, Issue 1, Spring 2011, Pages: 53–87, KLAUS G. MELCHERS, NADJA LIENHARDT, MIRIAM VON AARBURG and MARTIN KLEINMANN

    Version of Record online : 17 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01202.x

  6. Organization, Processing, and Use of Performance Information: A Cognitive Role for Appraisal Instruments

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    Volume 27, Issue 21, November 1997, Pages: 1884–1905, Angelo S. DeNisi, Tina L. Robbins and Timothy P. Summers

    Version of Record online : 31 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01630.x

  7. Performance dimension accessibility: Implications for rating accuracy

    Journal of Organizational Behavior

    Volume 13, Issue 4, July 1992, Pages: 357–367, David J. Woehr

    Version of Record online : 21 NOV 2006, DOI: 10.1002/job.4030130404

  8. Performance Appraisal and Development

    The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement

    Jeffrey R. Spence, Patricia L. Baratta, Pages: 437–461, 2014

    Published Online : 24 NOV 2014, DOI: 10.1002/9781118736982.ch22

  9. You have free access to this content
    MONITORING FACULTY CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE IN THE ADVANCED PLACEMENT ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION PROGRAM WITH A MANY-FACETED RASCH MODEL

    ETS Research Report Series

    Volume 2003, Issue 1, June 2003, Pages: i–60, George Engelhard Jr. and Carol M. Myford

    Version of Record online : 8 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2003.tb01893.x

  10. Effectiveness of Performance Appraisal: An Integrated Framework

    International Journal of Management Reviews

    Volume 17, Issue 4, October 2015, Pages: 510–533, Muhammad Zahid Iqbal, Saeed Akbar and Pawan Budhwar

    Version of Record online : 31 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12050

  11. RATER SOURCE EFFECTS ARE ALIVE AND WELL AFTER ALL

    Personnel Psychology

    Volume 63, Issue 1, Spring 2010, Pages: 119–151, BRIAN HOFFMAN, CHARLES E. LANCE, BETHANY BYNUM and WILLIAM A. GENTRY

    Version of Record online : 18 FEB 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01164.x

  12. Evaluating Efforts to Minimize Rater Bias in Scoring Classroom Observations

    Designing Teacher Evaluation Systems

    Yoon Soo Park, Jing Chen, Steven L. Holtzman, Pages: 381–414, 2015

    Published Online : 16 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1002/9781119210856.ch12

  13. An exploratory study of current performance management practices: Human resource executives’ perspectives

    International Journal of Selection and Assessment

    Volume 25, Issue 2, June 2017, Pages: 193–202, C. Allen Gorman, John P. Meriac, Sylvia G. Roch, Joshua L. Ray and Jason S. Gamble

    Version of Record online : 8 MAY 2017, DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12172

  14. EXERCISES AND DIMENSIONS ARE THE CURRENCY OF ASSESSMENT CENTERS

    Personnel Psychology

    Volume 64, Issue 2, Summer 2011, Pages: 351–395, BRIAN J. HOFFMAN, KLAUS G. MELCHERS, CARRIE A. BLAIR, MARTIN KLEINMANN and ROBERT T. LADD

    Version of Record online : 27 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01213.x

  15. Experimental study comparing a traditional approach to performance appraisal training to a whole-brain training method at C.B. Fleet Laboratories

    Human Resource Development Quarterly

    Volume 23, Issue 1, Spring 2012, Pages: 9–34, Sally Selden, Tom Sherrier and Robert Wooters

    Version of Record online : 19 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.21123

  16. The impact of non-performance information on ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach

    Journal of Organizational Behavior

    Volume 31, Issue 4, May 2010, Pages: 587–608, Jeffrey R. Spence and Lisa M. Keeping

    Version of Record online : 28 JUL 2009, DOI: 10.1002/job.648

  17. Now You See Them, Now You Do Not: The Influence of Indicator–Factor Ratio on Support for Assessment Center Dimensions

    Personnel Psychology

    Volume 66, Issue 4, Winter 2013, Pages: 1009–1047, Elizabeth L. Monahan, Brian J. Hoffman, Charles E. Lance, Duncan J. R. Jackson and Mark R. Foster

    Version of Record online : 23 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1111/peps.12049

  18. Application of Latent Trait Models to Identifying Substantively Interesting Raters

    Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

    Volume 31, Issue 3, Fall 2012, Pages: 31–37, Edward W. Wolfe and Aaron McVay

    Version of Record online : 18 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00241.x

  19. Advances in the Science of Performance Appraisal: Implications for Practice

    International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2006, Volume 21

    Gary P. Latham, Sara Mann, Pages: 295–337, 2008

    Published Online : 16 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/9780470696378.ch7

  20. Accuracy and effectiveness in appraisal outcomes: the influence of self-efficacy, personal factors and organisational variables

    Human Resource Management Journal

    Volume 18, Issue 3, July 2008, Pages: 295–313, Robert E. Wood and Verena Marshall

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2008.00067.x