Search Results

There are 149170 results for: content related to: The effect of line-up administrator blindness on the recording of eyewitness identification decisions

  1. Identification accuracy for single- and double-perpetrator crimes: Does accomplice gender matter?

    British Journal of Psychology

    Volume 103, Issue 4, November 2012, Pages: 439–453, Ahmed M. Megreya and Markus Bindemann

    Version of Record online : 18 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02084.x

  2. Live Showups and Their Influence on a Subsequent Video Line-up

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 26, Issue 1, January/February 2012, Pages: 1–23, Tim Valentine, Josh P Davis, Amina Memon and Andrew Roberts

    Version of Record online : 2 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1002/acp.1796

  3. The Appearance-Change Instruction Does Not Improve Line-up Identification Accuracy

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 28, Issue 2, March/April 2014, Pages: 151–160, Devon Porter, Alexa Moss and Daniel Reisberg

    Version of Record online : 9 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2985

  4. When is an intervening line-up most likely to affect eyewitness identification accuracy?

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 10, Issue 2, September 2005, Pages: 247–263, Kathy Pezdek and Iris Blandon-Gitlin

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1348/135532505X49846

  5. An evaluation of the fairness of police line-ups and video identifications

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 13, Issue S1, November 1999, Pages: S59–S72, Tim Valentine and Pamela Heaton

    Version of Record online : 17 NOV 1999, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+<S59::AID-ACP679>3.0.CO;2-Y

  6. The Cost of Detecting Deception: Judging Veracity Makes Eyewitnesses Remember a Suspect Less Accurately but With More Certainty

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 28, Issue 3, May/June 2014, Pages: 314–326, Kerri L. Pickel, Brittney M. Klauser and Heather M. Bauer

    Version of Record online : 17 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2991

  7. Obtaining and Interpreting Eyewitness Identification Test Evidence: The Influence of Police–Witness Interactions

    Handbook of Psychology of Investigative Interviewing: Current Developments and Future Directions

    Neil Brewer, Gary L. Wells, Pages: 205–220, 2009

    Published Online : 17 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470747599.ch12

  8. Recent Developments in North American Identification Science and Practice

    Handbook of Psychology of Investigative Interviewing: Current Developments and Future Directions

    Steven D. Penrod, Margaret Bull Kovera, Pages: 257–283, 2009

    Published Online : 17 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470747599.ch15

  9. The effect of evidence type, identification accuracy, line-up presentation, and line-up administration on observers' perceptions of eyewitnesses

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 20, Issue 2, September 2015, Pages: 343–364, Jennifer L. Beaudry, Roderick C. L. Lindsay, Amy-May Leach, Jamal K. Mansour, Michelle I. Bertrand and Natalie Kalmet

    Version of Record online : 12 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12030

  10. The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidentified?

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 4, Issue 1, January/February 1990, Pages: 3–31, J. D. Read, P. Tollestrup, R. Hammersley, E. McFadzen and A. Christensen

    Version of Record online : 13 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350040103

  11. Post-identification feedback effects: Investigators and evaluators

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 25, Issue 5, September/October 2011, Pages: 739–752, Carla. L. MacLean, C.A. Elizabeth Brimacombe, Meredith Allison, Leora C. Dahl and Helena Kadlec

    Version of Record online : 17 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1002/acp.1745

  12. Recent Developments in Eyewitness Identification Procedures in the United Kingdom

    Handbook of Psychology of Investigative Interviewing: Current Developments and Future Directions

    Tim Valentine, Carwyn Hughes, Rod Munro, Pages: 221–240, 2009

    Published Online : 17 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470747599.ch13

  13. Trussht me, I know what I sshaw: The acceptance of misinformation from an apparently unreliable co-witness

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 21, Issue 1, February 2016, Pages: 127–140, Rachel Zajac, Jake Dickson, Robert Munn and Sarah O'Neill

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12032

  14. You have free access to this content
    Line-up Fairness Affects Postdictor Validity and ‘Don't Know’ Responses

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 31, Issue 1, January/February 2017, Pages: 59–68, Kylie N. Key, Stacy A. Wetmore, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Scott D. Gronlund, Daniella K. Cash and Sean Lane

    Version of Record online : 20 DEC 2016, DOI: 10.1002/acp.3302

  15. Perception of line-up suggestiveness: effects of identification outcome knowledge

    Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

    Volume 7, Issue 3, October 2010, Pages: 214–230, Karl Ask and Pär Anders Granhag

    Version of Record online : 1 JUL 2010, DOI: 10.1002/jip.123

  16. The Mystery Man Can Help Reduce False Identification for Child Witnesses: Evidence from Video Line-ups

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 27, Issue 1, January/February 2013, Pages: 50–59, Catriona Havard and Amina Memon

    Version of Record online : 13 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2870

  17. Can Implicit Associations Distinguish True and False Eyewitness Memory? Development and Preliminary Testing of the IATe

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Rebecca K. Helm, Stephen J. Ceci and Kayla A. Burd

    Version of Record online : 23 JAN 2017, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2272

  18. The Positive Influence of Creating a Holistic Facial Composite on Video Line-up Identification

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 28, Issue 5, September/October 2014, Pages: 634–639, Josh P. Davis, Stuart Gibson and Chris Solomon

    Version of Record online : 13 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1002/acp.3045

  19. Turning a blind eye to double blind line-ups

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 24, Issue 6, September 2010, Pages: 849–867, Daniel B. Wright, Marianna E. Carlucci, Jacqueline R. Evans and Nadja Schreiber Compo

    Version of Record online : 22 JUN 2009, DOI: 10.1002/acp.1592

  20. Co-witness information influences whether a witness is likely to choose from a lineup

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 18, Issue 1, February 2013, Pages: 168–180, Lora M. Levett

    Version of Record online : 25 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02033.x