Search Results

There are 13972 results for: content related to: Appendix B: THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE OF B'NAI B'RITH AND THE ITALIANS IN AMERICA

  1. You have free access to this content
    Appendix C: THE STUPID LIE

    Center for Migration Studies special issues

    Volume 2, Issue 1, January 1976, Pages: 175–182, Giovanni Schiavo

    Version of Record online : 18 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.2050-411X.1976.tb00384.x

  2. Corporate defamation: reputation, rights and remedies

    Legal Studies

    Volume 33, Issue 2, June 2013, Pages: 264–288, Gary KY Chan

    Version of Record online : 28 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00258.x

  3. FACILITATING THE FLOW OF TRUTHFUL PERSONNEL INFORMATION: SOME NEEDED CHANGE IN THE STANDARD REQUIRED TO OVER-COME THE QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE TO DEFAME

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 26, Issue 2, June 1988, Pages: 305–323, O. LEE REED and JAN W. HENKEL

    Version of Record online : 22 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1988.tb00525.x

  4. Winner of the SLS Annual Conference Best Paper Prize 2010 ‘Veritas non est defamatio’? Truth as a defence in the law of defamation

    Legal Studies

    Volume 31, Issue 1, March 2011, Pages: 1–20, Eric Descheemaeker

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00191.x

  5. The Failure of Defamation Law to Safeguard against SLAPPs in Ontario

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 19, Issue 1, April 2010, Pages: 70–82, Ramani Nadarajah and Renee Griffin

    Version of Record online : 17 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00665.x

  6. The Protection of Reputation in Japan: A Systematic Analysis of Defamation Cases

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 37, Issue 1, Winter 2012, Pages: 89–118, Noriko Kitajima

    Version of Record online : 29 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01282.x

  7. Winners and losers and Why: A Study of Defamation litigation

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 5, Issue 3, July 1980, Pages: 457–500, Marc A. Franklin

    Version of Record online : 28 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1980.tb00857.x

  8. EMPOLOYEE REFERNECES: WILL A “NO COMMETNT” POLICY PROTECT EMPLOYERS AGASINST LIABILITY FOR DEFAMATION?

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 25, Issue 2, June 1987, Pages: 207–239, ROBERT A. PRENTICE and BRENDA J. WINSLETT

    Version of Record online : 22 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1987.tb00797.x

  9. Defamation Cases against Historians

    History and Theory

    Volume 41, Issue 3, October 2002, Pages: 346–366, Antoon De Baets

    Version of Record online : 17 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2303.00210

  10. RELAXED LIABILITY: A PROPOSED NEW STANDARD FOR DEFAMATION BY THE PRESS

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 22, Issue 1, March 1984, Pages: 93–108, CHARLES J. HARTMANN, MICHAEL E. SOLIMINE, STEPHEN M. RENAS and RISHI KUMAR

    Version of Record online : 22 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1984.tb00392.x

  11. Defamation law in a changing society: the case of Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn Mayer

    Legal Studies

    Volume 20, Issue 2, June 2000, Pages: 291–319, Leslie Kim Treiger-Bar-Am

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2000.tb00144.x

  12. Mapping Defamation Defences

    The Modern Law Review

    Volume 78, Issue 4, July 2015, Pages: 641–671, Eric Descheemaeker

    Version of Record online : 1 JUL 2015, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12132

  13. The Evolution of Business Celebrity in American Law and Society

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 48, Issue 2, Summer 2011, Pages: 177–225, Patricia Sánchez Abril

    Version of Record online : 19 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01114.x

  14. What Conversation? Free Speech and Defamation Law

    The Modern Law Review

    Volume 73, Issue 5, September 2010, Pages: 697–720, Andrew T. Kenyon

    Version of Record online : 17 AUG 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00815.x

  15. Communication, defamation and liability of intermediaries

    Legal Studies

    Volume 35, Issue 2, June 2015, Pages: 348–368, Jan Oster

    Version of Record online : 23 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lest.12064

  16. Universities, Defamation and the Internet

    The Modern Law Review

    Volume 62, Issue 1, January 1999, Pages: 58–78, Douglas W. Vick, Linda Macpherson and Sarah Cooper

    Version of Record online : 17 FEB 2003, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.00191

  17. Libel: Its Purpose and Reform

    The Modern Law Review

    Volume 74, Issue 6, November 2011, Pages: 845–877, David Howarth

    Version of Record online : 17 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00875.x

  18. STOPPING THE END-RUN BY PUBLIC PLAINTIFFS: FALWELL AND THE REFORTIFICATION OF DEFAMATION LAW'S CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 26, Issue 4, December 1989, Pages: 665–708, ARLEN W. LANGVARDT

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1988.tb01508.x

  19. EMPLOYER (IR)RATIONALITY AND THE DEMISE OF EMPLOYMENT REFERENCES

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 30, Issue 1, May 1992, Pages: 123–142, RAMONA L. PAETZOLD and STEVEN L. WILLBORN

    Version of Record online : 27 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1992.tb00657.x

  20. You have free access to this content
    5: BOOKS AND ARTICLES

    Center for Migration Studies special issues

    Volume 9, Issue 3, May 1992, Pages: 91–348,

    Version of Record online : 18 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.2050-411X.1992.tb01006.x