Search Results

There are 29332 results for: content related to: When is an intervening line-up most likely to affect eyewitness identification accuracy?

  1. Live Showups and Their Influence on a Subsequent Video Line-up

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 26, Issue 1, January/February 2012, Pages: 1–23, Tim Valentine, Josh P Davis, Amina Memon and Andrew Roberts

    Version of Record online : 2 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1002/acp.1796

  2. Recent Developments in North American Identification Science and Practice

    Handbook of Psychology of Investigative Interviewing: Current Developments and Future Directions

    Steven D. Penrod, Margaret Bull Kovera, Pages: 257–283, 2009

    Published Online : 17 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470747599.ch15

  3. The effect of evidence type, identification accuracy, line-up presentation, and line-up administration on observers' perceptions of eyewitnesses

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 20, Issue 2, September 2015, Pages: 343–364, Jennifer L. Beaudry, Roderick C. L. Lindsay, Amy-May Leach, Jamal K. Mansour, Michelle I. Bertrand and Natalie Kalmet

    Version of Record online : 12 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12030

  4. Delay and Age Effects on Identification Accuracy and Confidence: An Investigation Using a Video Identification Parade

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 26, Issue 1, January/February 2012, Pages: 130–139, Brian R. Clifford, Catriona Havard, Amina Memon and Fiona Gabbert

    Version of Record online : 5 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1002/acp.1804

  5. The Appearance-Change Instruction Does Not Improve Line-up Identification Accuracy

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 28, Issue 2, March/April 2014, Pages: 151–160, Devon Porter, Alexa Moss and Daniel Reisberg

    Version of Record online : 9 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2985

  6. Recent Developments in Eyewitness Identification Procedures in the United Kingdom

    Handbook of Psychology of Investigative Interviewing: Current Developments and Future Directions

    Tim Valentine, Carwyn Hughes, Rod Munro, Pages: 221–240, 2009

    Published Online : 17 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470747599.ch13

  7. Improving children's performance on photographic line-ups: Do the physical properties of a ‘wildcard’ make a difference?

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Rachel Zajac and Fiona Jack

    Version of Record online : 19 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12075

  8. Identification accuracy for single- and double-perpetrator crimes: Does accomplice gender matter?

    British Journal of Psychology

    Volume 103, Issue 4, November 2012, Pages: 439–453, Ahmed M. Megreya and Markus Bindemann

    Version of Record online : 18 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02084.x

  9. Uses and abuses of eyewitness identification confidence

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 11, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages: 3–23, Neil Brewer

    Version of Record online : 11 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1348/135532505X79672

  10. Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers

    European Journal of Social Psychology

    Volume 22, Issue 2, March/April 1992, Pages: 157–180, Siegfried Ludwig Sporer

    Version of Record online : 24 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220205

  11. Suggestiveness in photospread line-ups: Similarity induces distinctiveness

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 6, Issue 5, September/October 1992, Pages: 443–453, Michael S. Wogalter, D. Bradley Marwitz and David C. Leonard

    Version of Record online : 13 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350060508

  12. Is there a magical time boundary for diagnosing eyewitness identification accuracy in sequential line-ups?

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 13, Issue 1, February 2008, Pages: 123–135, James D. Sauer, Dr Neil Brewer and Gary L. Wells

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1348/135532506X159203

  13. Eyewitness Identification

    Applying Psychology to Criminal Justice

    Ronald P. Fisher, Margaret C. Reardon, Pages: 21–38, 2008

    Published Online : 13 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1002/9780470713068.ch2

  14. Facial composites and the misinformation effect: How composites distort memory

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Lisa D. Topp-Manriquez, Dawn McQuiston and Roy S. Malpass

    Version of Record online : 28 MAY 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12054

  15. An evaluation of the fairness of police line-ups and video identifications

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 13, Issue S1, November 1999, Pages: S59–S72, Tim Valentine and Pamela Heaton

    Version of Record online : 17 NOV 1999, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+<S59::AID-ACP679>3.0.CO;2-Y

  16. The Mystery Man Can Help Reduce False Identification for Child Witnesses: Evidence from Video Line-ups

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 27, Issue 1, January/February 2013, Pages: 50–59, Catriona Havard and Amina Memon

    Version of Record online : 13 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2870

  17. Crime Type, Perceived Stereotypicality, and Memory Biases: A Contextual Model of Eyewitness Identification

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 28, Issue 3, May/June 2014, Pages: 392–402, Danny Osborne and Paul G. Davies

    Version of Record online : 24 FEB 2014, DOI: 10.1002/acp.3009

  18. A Maturing of Research on the Behaviour of Eyewitnesses

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 5, Issue 5, September/October 1991, Pages: 377–402, Kenneth A. Deffenbacher

    Version of Record online : 13 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350050502

  19. Matching Face Images Taken on the Same Day or Months Apart: the Limitations of Photo ID

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 27, Issue 6, November/December 2013, Pages: 700–706, Ahmed M. Megreya, Adam Sandford and A. Mike Burton

    Version of Record online : 30 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2965

  20. The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidentified?

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 4, Issue 1, January/February 1990, Pages: 3–31, J. D. Read, P. Tollestrup, R. Hammersley, E. McFadzen and A. Christensen

    Version of Record online : 13 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350040103