Search Results

There are 16879 results for: content related to: Benefit Sharing for All?: Bioprospecting NGOs, Intellectual Property Rights, New Governmentalities

  1. Bi-polar Disorder? Is Bioprospecting an Emerging Issue for the Arctic as well as for Antarctica?

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 17, Issue 1, April 2008, Pages: 41–55, David Leary

    Article first published online : 7 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2008.00584.x

  2. The Evolution of Benefit Sharing: Linking Biodiversity and Community Livelihoods

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 19, Issue 2, July 2010, Pages: 150–173, Elisa Morgera and Elsa Tsioumani

    Article first published online : 6 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00674.x

  3. HOW SHOULD THE BENEFITS OF BIOPROSPECTING BE SHARED?

    Hastings Center Report

    Volume 40, Issue 1, January-February 2010, Pages: 24–33, JOSEPH MILLUM

    Article first published online : 8 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1353/hcr.0.0227

  4. Implementing the Nagoya Protocol on ABS: A Hypothetical Case Study on Enforcing Benefit Sharing in Norway

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 14, Issue 5, September 2011, Pages: 383–402, Morten W. Tvedt and Ole K. Fauchald

    Article first published online : 7 SEP 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2011.00424.x

  5. Rhetoric, Realism and Benefit-Sharing

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 7, Issue 6, November 2004, Pages: 851–876, Rachel Wynberg

    Article first published online : 1 NOV 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2004.tb00231.x

  6. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Bioprospecting in the High Seas: Regulatory Options for Benefit Sharing

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 16, Issue 3-4, July 2013, Pages: 150–167, Morten Walløe Tvedt and Ane E. Jørem

    Article first published online : 9 JUL 2013, DOI: 10.1002/jwip.12010

  7. NORTH–SOUTH BENEFIT SHARING ARRANGEMENTS IN BIOPROSPECTING AND GENETIC RESEARCH: A CRITICAL ETHICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

    Developing World Bioethics

    Volume 6, Issue 3, December 2006, Pages: 122–134, UDO SCHÜKLENK and ANITA KLEINSMIDT

    Article first published online : 14 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00149.x

  8. Elements for Legislation in User Countries to Meet the Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing Commitment

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 9, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages: 189–212, Morten Walløe Tvedt

    Article first published online : 28 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1422-2213.2006.00274.x

  9. The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 20, Issue 1, April 2011, Pages: 47–61, Matthias Buck and Clare Hamilton

    Article first published online : 19 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2011.00703.x

  10. Patenting of Research Results Related to Genetic Resources from Areas beyond National Jurisdiction: The Crossroads of the Law of the Sea and Intellectual Property Law

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 16, Issue 1, April 2007, Pages: 12–23, Charlotte Salpin and Valentina Germani

    Article first published online : 10 APR 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2007.00538.x

  11. How to Break the Deadlock Preventing a Fair and Rational Use of Biodiversity

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 11, Issue 4, July 2008, Pages: 229–295, Joseph Straus

    Article first published online : 17 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00344.x

  12. Regulating the use of genetic resources – between international authorities

    European Environment

    Volume 16, Issue 5, September/October 2006, Pages: 265–277, G. Kristin Rosendal

    Article first published online : 26 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1002/eet.424

  13. Biodiversity and Business: Coming to Terms with the ‘Grand Bargain’

    International Affairs

    Volume 76, Issue 2, April 2000, Pages: 241–264, Kerry Ten Kate and Sarah A. Laird

    Article first published online : 16 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.00132

  14. BIODIVERSITY, BIOPIRACY AND BENEFITS: WHAT ALLEGATIONS OF BIOPIRACY TELL US ABOUT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

    Developing World Bioethics

    Volume 6, Issue 3, December 2006, Pages: 158–173, CHRIS HAMILTON

    Article first published online : 21 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00168.x

  15. The Bonn Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 12, Issue 1, April 2003, Pages: 84–98, Stephen Tully

    Article first published online : 24 APR 2003, DOI: 10.1111/1467-9388.00346

  16. You have free access to this content
    Gambling in the deep sea

    EMBO reports

    Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages: 17–21, Laura Ruth

    Article first published online : 1 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400609

  17. VICISSITUDES OF BENEFIT SHARING OF CROP GENETIC RESOURCES: DOWNSTREAM AND UPSTREAM

    Developing World Bioethics

    Volume 6, Issue 3, December 2006, Pages: 144–157, BRAM DE JONGE and MICHIEL KORTHALS

    Article first published online : 21 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00167.x

  18. Bioprospecting: from theory to practice (and back again)

    Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers

    Volume 28, Issue 1, March 2003, Pages: 35–55, Noel Castree

    Article first published online : 26 MAR 2003, DOI: 10.1111/1475-5661.00076

  19. EVALUATING THE PROSPECTS OF BENEFIT SHARING SCHEMES IN PROTECTING MOUNTAIN GORILLAS IN CENTRAL AFRICA

    Natural Resource Modeling

    Volume 26, Issue 4, November 2013, Pages: 455–479, SAMSON MUKANJARI, BIRGIT BEDNAR-FRIEDL, EDWIN MUCHAPONDWA and PRECIOUS ZIKHALI

    Article first published online : 28 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/nrm.12010