Search Results

There are 23468 results for: content related to: Benefit Sharing for All?: Bioprospecting NGOs, Intellectual Property Rights, New Governmentalities

  1. Bi-polar Disorder? Is Bioprospecting an Emerging Issue for the Arctic as well as for Antarctica?

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 17, Issue 1, April 2008, Pages: 41–55, David Leary

    Version of Record online : 7 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2008.00584.x

  2. The Evolution of Benefit Sharing: Linking Biodiversity and Community Livelihoods

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 19, Issue 2, July 2010, Pages: 150–173, Elisa Morgera and Elsa Tsioumani

    Version of Record online : 6 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00674.x

  3. HOW SHOULD THE BENEFITS OF BIOPROSPECTING BE SHARED?

    Hastings Center Report

    Volume 40, Issue 1, January-February 2010, Pages: 24–33, JOSEPH MILLUM

    Version of Record online : 8 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1353/hcr.0.0227

  4. Access and Benefit Sharing Legislation for Marine Bioprospecting: Lessons From Australia for the Role of Marbank in Norway

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 19, Issue 3-4, July 2016, Pages: 86–98, G. Kristin Rosendal, Anne Ingeborg Myhr and Morten Walløe Tvedt

    Version of Record online : 6 JUN 2016, DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12058

  5. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Bioprospecting in the High Seas: Regulatory Options for Benefit Sharing

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 16, Issue 3-4, July 2013, Pages: 150–167, Morten Walløe Tvedt and Ane E. Jørem

    Version of Record online : 9 JUL 2013, DOI: 10.1002/jwip.12010

  6. Bioprospecting: from theory to practice (and back again)

    Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers

    Volume 28, Issue 1, March 2003, Pages: 35–55, Noel Castree

    Version of Record online : 26 MAR 2003, DOI: 10.1111/1475-5661.00076

  7. Biodiversity Fetishism and Biotechnology Promises in Brazil: From Policy Contradictions to Legal Adjustments

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 15, Issue 2, March 2012, Pages: 133–154, Geoffroy Filoche

    Version of Record online : 13 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2011.00434.x

  8. Implementing the Nagoya Protocol on ABS: A Hypothetical Case Study on Enforcing Benefit Sharing in Norway

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 14, Issue 5, September 2011, Pages: 383–402, Morten W. Tvedt and Ole K. Fauchald

    Version of Record online : 7 SEP 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2011.00424.x

  9. Rhetoric, Realism and Benefit-Sharing

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 7, Issue 6, November 2004, Pages: 851–876, Rachel Wynberg

    Version of Record online : 1 NOV 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2004.tb00231.x

  10. How to Break the Deadlock Preventing a Fair and Rational Use of Biodiversity

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 11, Issue 4, July 2008, Pages: 229–295, Joseph Straus

    Version of Record online : 17 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00344.x

  11. Regulating the use of genetic resources – between international authorities

    European Environment

    Volume 16, Issue 5, September/October 2006, Pages: 265–277, G. Kristin Rosendal

    Version of Record online : 26 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1002/eet.424

  12. Biodiversity and Business: Coming to Terms with the ‘Grand Bargain’

    International Affairs

    Volume 76, Issue 2, April 2000, Pages: 241–264, Kerry Ten Kate and Sarah A. Laird

    Version of Record online : 16 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.00132

  13. BIODIVERSITY, BIOPIRACY AND BENEFITS: WHAT ALLEGATIONS OF BIOPIRACY TELL US ABOUT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

    Developing World Bioethics

    Volume 6, Issue 3, December 2006, Pages: 158–173, CHRIS HAMILTON

    Version of Record online : 21 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00168.x

  14. NORTH–SOUTH BENEFIT SHARING ARRANGEMENTS IN BIOPROSPECTING AND GENETIC RESEARCH: A CRITICAL ETHICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

    Developing World Bioethics

    Volume 6, Issue 3, December 2006, Pages: 122–134, UDO SCHÜKLENK and ANITA KLEINSMIDT

    Version of Record online : 14 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00149.x

  15. You have free access to this content
    Gambling in the deep sea

    EMBO reports

    Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages: 17–21, Laura Ruth

    Version of Record online : 1 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400609

  16. VICISSITUDES OF BENEFIT SHARING OF CROP GENETIC RESOURCES: DOWNSTREAM AND UPSTREAM

    Developing World Bioethics

    Volume 6, Issue 3, December 2006, Pages: 144–157, BRAM DE JONGE and MICHIEL KORTHALS

    Version of Record online : 21 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00167.x

  17. Elements for Legislation in User Countries to Meet the Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing Commitment

    The Journal of World Intellectual Property

    Volume 9, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages: 189–212, Morten Walløe Tvedt

    Version of Record online : 28 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1422-2213.2006.00274.x

  18. The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 20, Issue 1, April 2011, Pages: 47–61, Matthias Buck and Clare Hamilton

    Version of Record online : 19 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2011.00703.x

  19. Promises and Pitfalls: First Steps on the Road to the International ABS Regime

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    Volume 14, Issue 2, July 2005, Pages: 148–160, Timothy J. Hodges and Anne Daniel

    Version of Record online : 12 AUG 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2005.00435.x