Research Article
Dynamic ligand design and combinatorial optimization: Designing inhibitors to endothiapepsin
Article first published online: 24 MAY 2000
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000801)40:2<258::AID-PROT80>3.0.CO;2-I
Copyright © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Issue
1097-0134/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=d817e79b67ba6cacf8bdcce1a819c04de300a7e3)
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Volume 40, Issue 2, pages 258–289, 1 August 2000
Additional Information
How to Cite
Stultz, C. M. and Karplus, M. (2000), Dynamic ligand design and combinatorial optimization: Designing inhibitors to endothiapepsin. Proteins, 40: 258–289. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000801)40:2<258::AID-PROT80>3.0.CO;2-I
Publication History
- Issue published online: 24 MAY 2000
- Article first published online: 24 MAY 2000
- Manuscript Accepted: 14 FEB 2000
- Manuscript Received: 12 JUL 1999
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- ligand design;
- binding affinity;
- endothiapepsin;
- functional optimization
Abstract
The dynamic ligand design (DLD) algorithm, an automated method for the creation of novel ligands, links up small functional groups that have been placed in energetically favorable positions in the binding site of a target molecule. The positions and orientations of the small functional groups can be determined using the multi-copy simultaneous search approach (MCSS) or experimental data. In this work the original DLD methodology is extended by using a modified version of the pseudo-potential energy function. A novel simulated annealing protocol is presented for optimizing the pseudo-potential energy of ligands in the binding site; the protocol is expected to be applicable to other optimization problems. The utility of the method is illustrated by designing an inhibitor for endothiapepsin. The binding affinity of the inhibitor is assessed using a thermodynamic cycle that decomposes the binding free energy into a sum of translational, rotational, configurational, hydrophobic, and electrostatic contributions. The calculations suggest that the designed molecule will bind endothiapepsin with high affinity. Proteins 2000;40:258–289. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1097-0134/asset/PROT_centre.gif?v=1&s=77b56b1f2cdaba74cb3bb149bd9b029cd8803cdb)