SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Miles S, Davis T. Patients who can't read: implication for the health care system [Invited editorial]. JAMA 1995; 274 (21): 171920.
  • 2
    Kirsch I, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult literacy in america: a first look at the result of the national adult literacy survey. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept. Of Education, 1993.
  • 3
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington DC: U.S. Printing Office, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 91-50213, 1991: 72, 115.
  • 4
    American Cancer Society. Cancer and the socioeconomically disadvantaged. CA Cancer J Clin 1989; 39: 26395.
  • 5
    Cella DF, Orav EJ, Kornblith AB, Holland JC, Silberfarb PM, Lee KW. et al. Socioeconomic status and cancer survival. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9 (8): 15009.
  • 6
    Freeman H. Race, poverty and cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83 (8): 5267.
  • 7
    Li A, Burton G, Glass J. Breast cancer socioeconomic and racial comparison between hospital populations [abstract]. Clin Res 1993; 41: 235A.
  • 8
    Rimer BK, Trock B, Engstrom PF, Lerman C, King E. Why do some women get regular mammograms. Am J Prev Med 1991; 7 (2): 6974.
  • 9
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Breast cancer risk factors and screening: United States,1987 Washington DC: Vital and Health Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, 1987: 1326.
  • 10
    Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanze JE, Greene HL. Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health 1989; 79 (11): 1499502.
  • 11
    National Center for Educational Statistics, Educational Testing Services, Office of Education, Research, and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. Adult Literacy in America. 1993.
  • 12
    Brazius JA, Foster SE. Enhancing adult literacy: A policy guide. Washington, DC: Council of State Policy and Planning Agencies, 1987.
  • 13
    Dowling W. Reading level analysis of written materials distributed by the Ohio Cancer Information Service. Columbus, Ohio: Adult Literacy Center for Individual and Organizational Development, 1990.
  • 14
    Weiss BD, Hart G, McGee DL. D'Estelle S. Health status of illiterate adults: relationship between literacy and health status among persons with low literacy skills. J Am Board Fam Pract 1992; 5: 25765.
  • 15
    Breen MJ. Partners in practice: the Literacy and Health Project Phase Two. August 1990-October 1992. Summary Report. Toronto, Ontario, Ontario Public Health Association, 1993.
  • 16
    Centers for Disease Control. Health beliefs and compliance. JAMA 1990; 264: 2864.
  • 17
    Davis TC, Crouch MA, Wills G, Miller S, Abdehou DM. The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. Pediatrics 1994; 93 (3): 4608.
  • 18
    Doak CC, Doak LG. Teaching patients with low-literacy skills. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: J.B.Lippincott, 1996.
  • 19
    Doak CC, Doak LG. The challenge in diabetes education: So that the client may understand. Diabetes Care Educ 1993; 14 (2): 911.
  • 20
    Somora J, Saunders L, Larson RF. Medical vocabulary and knowledge among hospital patients. J Health Hum Behav 1961; 2 (2): 8392.
  • 21
    Weiss BD, Hart G, Pust RE. The relationship between literacy and health. J Health Care Underserved 1991; 1 (4): 35163.
  • 22
    National Cancer Institute, National Work Group on Cancer and Literacy, Bethesda, MD, May 7, 1992.
  • 23
    Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW. et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med 1993; 25 (6): 25660.
  • 24
    Kaestle CF, Damon-Moore HD, Stedman LC, Tinsley K, Tollinger WV Jr. Literacy in the United States: readers and reading since 1880. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.
  • 25
    Parker R, Baker D, Williams M, Nurss J. The test of functional health literacy in adults (TOFHLA): a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10: 53745.
  • 26
    SAS (R) Release 6. 11 edition. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1994.
  • 27
    Jackson RH, Davis TC. Results of a novel screening mammography program. Clin Res 1992; 40: 868a.
  • 28
    Parikh NS, Parker RM, Nurss JR, Baker DW, Williams MV. Shame and health literacy, the unspoken connection. Patient Educ Couns 1996; 27: 339.
  • 29
    Williams MV, Parker RM, Baker DW, Parikh NS, Pitkin K, Coates WC. et al. Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA 1995; 274 (21): 167782.
  • 30
    Michielutte R, Bahnson J, Beal P. Readability of the public education literature on cancer prevention and decision. J Cancer Educ 1990; 5 (1): 5561.
  • 31
    Meade CD, Diekmann J, Thornhill DG. Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature. Oncolo Nurs Forum 1992; 19 (1): 515.
  • 32
    Eng E. The Save our Sisters Project: a social network strategy for reaching rural black women. Cancer 1993; 72 (3): 10717.
  • 33
    Arnold C, Davis T. Improving mammography screening use in low-income, low-literate women. J Invest Med 1996; 44 (1): 57A.
  • 34
    Kiefe CI, McKay SV, Halevry A, Brody BA. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154 (111): 121724.
  • 35
    Fox S, Siu RL, Stein JA. The effects of physician communication in breast cancer screening of older women. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 205868.