Article
Pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms in forest firefighters
Article first published online: 6 DEC 1998
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199705)31:5<503::AID-AJIM3>3.0.CO;2-U
Copyright © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Betchley, C., Koenig, J. Q., van Belle, G., Checkoway, H. and Reinhardt, T. (1997), Pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms in forest firefighters. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 31: 503–509. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199705)31:5<503::AID-AJIM3>3.0.CO;2-U
Publication History
- Issue published online: 6 DEC 1998
- Article first published online: 6 DEC 1998
- Manuscript Accepted: 22 OCT 1996
Funded by
- Forest Service, U.S.D.A.. Grant Number: PNW 91-0031
- Abstract
- Cited By
Keywords:
- pulmonary function;
- forest firefighters;
- smoke exposure;
- respiratory health
Abstract
This study evaluated effects on respiratory health of forest firefighters exposed to high concentrations of smoke during their work shift. This is the first study of cross-shift-respiratory effects in forest firefighters conducted on the job. Spirometric measurements and self-administered questionnaire data were collected before and after the 1992 firefighting season. Seventy-six (76) subjects were studied for cross-shift and 53 for cross-season analysis. On average, the cross-season data were collected 77.7 days after the last occupational smoke exposure. The cross-shift analysis identified significant mean individual declines in FVC, FEV1 and FEF25–75. The preshift to midshift decreases were 0.089 L. 0. 190 L. and 0.439 L/sec. respectively, with preshift to postshift declines of 0.065 L. 0.150 L. and 0.496L/sec. Mean individual declines for FVC, FEV1 and FEF25–75 of 0.033 L. 0.104 L. and 0.275 L/sec. respectively, also were noted in the cross-season analysis. The FEV1 changed significantly (p < 0.05). The use of wood for indoor heat also was associated with the declines in FEV1. Although annual lung function changes for a small subset (n = 10) indicated reversibility of effect, this study suggests a concern for potential adverse respiratory effects in forest firefighters. Am. J. Ind. Med. 31:503–509, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss. Inc.

1097-0274/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=e0f33b687598b5adbbbced84abe7a827fb4a7d56)