SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Anderson, C. W. (1991). Policy implications of research on science teaching and teachers' knowledge. In M. M.Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 530). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Atwater, M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821838.
  • Barton, A. C., & Osborne, M. D. (1995). Science for all Americans? Science education re-form and Mexican-Americans. High School Journal, 78, 244252.
  • Brady, J. (1995). Schooling young children: A feminist pedagogy for liberatory learning. NY: SUNY Press.
  • Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: Reshaping the sciences of the future. Curriculum Studies, 26, 401416.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Diver-Stamnes, A. (1995). Lives in the balance: Youth, poverty, and education in Watts. New York: SUNY Press.
  • Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Education Research Journal, 33, 261295.
  • Equity Coalition for Race, Gender and National Origin. (1990). Science education and equity. Equity Coalition, 4.
  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research on teaching. In M. C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119161). New York: Macmillan.
  • Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban high school. New York: SUNY Press.
  • Freire, P. (1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
  • Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodernism, feminist and cultural politics. Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Gitlin, A. (1994). Power and method: Political activism and educational research. New York: Routledge.
  • Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourse as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Harding, S. (1986). The Science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as a practice of freedom. London: Routledge.
  • Hurd, P. (1993). Comment on science education research: A crisis of confidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 10091101.
  • Kahle, J., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on girls in science lessons and applications. In D.Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 542556). New York: Macmillan.
  • Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Kilborn, P. (1996). Shrinking safety net cradles hearts and hopes of children. The New York Times.
  • Kozol, J. (1988). Rachel and her children: Homeless families in America. New York: Random House.
  • Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.
  • Lensmire, T. (1994). When children write: Critical revisions of the writing workshop. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Lewis, M. (1993). Without a word: Teaching beyond women's silence. London: Routledge.
  • Maher, F., & Tetreault, M. (1994). Feminist classrooms. New York: Basic Books.
  • Manen, M. (1990). Research lived experiences. New York: SUNY Press.
  • McChesney, K. (1993). Homeless families since 1980. Education and Urban Society, 25, 361379.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
  • Packwood, A., & Sikes, P. (1996). Postmodern narrative. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3, 335346.
  • Polakow, V. (1993). Lives on the edge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Quint, S. (1994). Schooling homeless children: A working model for America's public schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Rafferty, Y., & Shinn, M. (1991). The impact of homelessness on children. American Psychologist, 46, 11701179.
  • Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist constructive perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 897930.
  • Stanford University Center for the Study of Families, Children and Youth. (1991). The Stanford studies of homeless families, children, and youth. Stanford, CA: author.
  • Stanley, & Wise. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology. New York: Routledge.
  • Stanley, W., & Brickhouse, N. (1995). Multiculturalism, universalism and science education. Science Education, 78, 387398.
  • Stronge, J. (1992). Educating homeless children and adolescents: Evaluating policy and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223241.
  • Weiler, K. (1988). Women teaching for change. South Hadley, MA: Bergen & Garvey.