SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Azzi, A. (1994). From competitive interests, perceived injustice and identity needs to collective action: Psychological mechanisms in ethnic nationalism. In B.Kapferer (Ed.), Nationalism, ethnicity and violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 543549.
  • Cook, K. S., & Hegtvedt, K. A. (1986). Justice and Power: An exchange analysis. In H. W.Bierhoff, R. L.Cohen and J.Greenberg (Eds), Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum.
  • Crawford, T. J., & Naditch, M. (1970). Relative deprivation, powerlessness and militancy: the psychology of protest. Psychiatry, 33: 208233.
  • Crocker, J. and Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: the self protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96: 608630.
  • Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27: 519.
  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological persepctive. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Dion, K. L. (1986). Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation. In J. M.Olson, C. P.Herman and M. P.Zanna (Eds), Relative deprivation and social comparisons: the Ontario symposium. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dube, L., & Guimond, S. (1986). Relative deprivation and social protest: the personal group issue. In J.Olson, C. P.Herman and M.Zanna (Eds), Relative deprivation and social comparison. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentments: a referent cognitions model. In J.Master and W.Smith (Eds), Social comparison, social justice and relative deprivation. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds), The european review of social psychology, (Vol. 4 pp. 126).
  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 561568.
  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Hafer, C. L., & Olson, J. M. (1993). Beliefs in a just world, discontent and assertive actions by working women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19: 3038.
  • Hoffman, E., & Spitzer, M. L. (1982). The Coase theorem: Some experimental tests. Journal of Law and Economics, 25: 7398.
  • Hoffman, E., & Spitzer, M. L. (1985). Entitlements, rights and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects' concepts of distributive justice. Journal of Legal Studies, 14: 259297.
  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  • Huo, Y. J. Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1994). The effects of relative social identification on justice concerns: Is assimilation necessary to maintain cohesion amid diversity? Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Kabanoff, B. (1991). Equity, equality, power and conflict. Academy of Mangement Review, 16: 416441.
  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59(suppl.): 285300.
  • Kawakami, K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). The impact of salient self-identities on relative deprivation and action intensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 525540.
  • Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans' views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Adegruyter.
  • Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13: 191228.
  • LaLonde, R. N., & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 7885.
  • Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., & de Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quaterly, 38: 224251.
  • Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control and procedural justice: instrumental and noinstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 952959.
  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Martin, J. (1986). The tolerance of injustice. In J.Olson, C. P.Herman and M.Zanna (Eds), Relative deprivation and social comparison: the Ontario symposium. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Montada, L. (1992). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In L.Montada, S.Filipp and M.Lerner (Eds), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3: 313344.
  • Moore, D. (1991). Entitlement and justice evaluations: who should get more and why? Social Psychology Quarterly, 54: 208223.
  • Optow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: and introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46: 129.
  • Pedhazur, E., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: an integrated approach. Hillsdale: New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1985). Three issues in ethnicity: boundaries, deprivations and perceptions. In J. M.Yinger and S. J.Cutler (Eds), Major social issues. New York: Free Press.
  • Reeves, R. (1994, January 23). The tax revolt that ruined California. The San Francisco Chronicle pp. 5, 8, 9, 10.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sears, D., & McConahay, J. (1970). Comparison levels and the Watts riots. Journal of Social Issues, 26: 121140.
  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J. Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
  • Smith, H. J., Spears, R., & Oyen, M. (1994). The influence of personal deprivation and salience of group membership on justice evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 277299.
  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S.Worchel, (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
  • Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1987). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives, New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorisation theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: a test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 830838.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1993). Governing amid diversity: Can fair decision-making procedures bridge across competing public interests? Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: The antecedents of distributive justice and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 850863.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Dawes, R. (1993). Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In B.Mellers and J.Baron (Eds), Psychological perspectives on justice: theory and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1994). Collective restraint in a social dilemma situation: The influence of procedural justice and community identification Accepted pending suitable revision, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  • Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. J. (1994). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1988). Intrinsic versus community-based justice models: when does group membership matter? Journal of Social Issues, 46: 8394.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 115191.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Mitchell, G. (1994). Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority: The United States Supreme Court and abortion rights. Duke Law Journal, 43: 703815.
  • Veilleux, F., & Tougas, F. (1989). Male acceptance of affirmative action programs for women: the results of altruistic or egoistical motives? International Journal of Psychology, 24: 485496.
  • Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13: 275283.
  • Wit, A. P. (1989). Group efficiency and fairness in social dilemmas: an experimental gaming approach. Doctoral dissertation, Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen.