1520-6696/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=ee2800f0585986b5d021ab93fd135e3d027f8edf)
Historians and the Bell Curve Controversies: A Special Symposium
Re-reconsidering Burt: Beyond a reasonable doubt
Article first published online: 7 DEC 1998
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199721)33:2<145::AID-JHBS6>3.0.CO;2-S
Copyright © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Issue
1520-6696/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=cd5d10273aaeac95f3104833a1aebeee1222a88e "Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences")
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences
Volume 33, Issue 2, pages 145–162, Spring 1997
Additional Information
How to Cite
Tucker, W. H. (1997), Re-reconsidering Burt: Beyond a reasonable doubt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 33: 145–162. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199721)33:2<145::AID-JHBS6>3.0.CO;2-S
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 DEC 1998
- Article first published online: 7 DEC 1998
- Abstract
- Cited By
Abstract
The Burt controversy has taken a number of strange twists and turns, leading many observers to conclude that has been exonerated of the accusation that he fabricated his data on monozygotic twins reared apart. A comparison of his twin sample with that from other well documented studies, however, leaves little doubt that he committed fraud. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.