SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • diabetic polyneuropathy;
  • clinical trials;
  • pharmacological treatment;
  • placebo;
  • efficacy measures

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are a widely accepted means of applying experimental methods to a clinical setting and have been advocated as the gold standard for comparing and evaluating different treatments. However, the quality of the RCTs published between 1981–1992 that evaluated the effects of medical treatment in diabetic polyneuropathy was poor. Adequate designs for RCTs in diabetic neuropathy have to consider the following aspects: type and stage of neuropathy, homogeneity of the study population, outcome measures (neurophysiological markers, intermediate clinical end points, ultimate clinical outcomes, quality of life), natural history, sample size, study duration, reproducibility of neurophysiological and intermediate end points, regression to the mean, true and perceived placebo effects, measures of treatment effect, generalisability of the overall trial result to individual patients, and the reporting of the RCTs. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.