Chapter 13. Genetic Information: Use and Abuse

  1. John Bryant Professor2,
  2. Dr Linda Baggott la Velle3,
  3. Revd Dr John Searle4
  1. Bartha Maria Knoppers

Published Online: 18 APR 2002

DOI: 10.1002/0470846593.ch13

Bioethics for Scientists

Bioethics for Scientists

How to Cite

Knoppers, B. M. (2002) Genetic Information: Use and Abuse, in Bioethics for Scientists (eds J. Bryant, L. B. la Velle and J. Searle), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/0470846593.ch13

Editor Information

  1. 2

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

  2. 3

    Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

  3. 4

    Exeter & District Hospice, Exeter, UK

Author Information

  1. Centre de Recherche en Droit Public, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada, Phone 00-1-514-343-6714, Fax 00-1-514-343-2122

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 18 APR 2002
  2. Published Print: 31 MAR 2002

ISBN Information

Print ISBN: 9780471495321

Online ISBN: 9780470846599

SEARCH

Keywords:

  • anonymisation;
  • confidentiality;
  • discrimination;
  • employers;
  • ethics;
  • family;
  • human rights;
  • insurers;
  • responsibility;
  • privacy

Summary

Recent developments in human genetic research have raised new, possibly unique issues. Firstly, genetic data must remain confidential but also accessible, with permission, to researchers. Total anonymisation of samples is not helpful because it means that useful findings can never be imparted to the person concerned; coding of samples is preferable. Secondly, there is the matter of access by third parties. Both UNESCO and HUGO emphasise a person's rights to protection of confidential information from unauthorised access. In several countries, employers and insurers cannot coerce people to reveal genetic information but in others the situation is less clear, raising the possibility of discrimination. Finally there is the tension between the right of an individual to confidentiality and the needs of other family members to know about conditions that may affect them. Although no-one is obliged to share such data, it is argued that affected individuals have a responsibility to do so.