Chapter 17. Dealing with Death: Euthanasia and Related Issues

  1. John Bryant Professor1,
  2. Dr Linda Baggott la Velle2,
  3. Revd Dr John Searle3
  1. John Searle

Published Online: 18 APR 2002

DOI: 10.1002/0470846593.ch17

Bioethics for Scientists

Bioethics for Scientists

How to Cite

Searle, J. (2002) Dealing with Death: Euthanasia and Related Issues, in Bioethics for Scientists (eds J. Bryant, L. B. la Velle and J. Searle), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/0470846593.ch17

Editor Information

  1. 1

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

  2. 2

    Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

  3. 3

    Exeter & District Hospice, Exeter, UK

Author Information

  1. Exeter & District Hospice, Exeter, UK

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 18 APR 2002
  2. Published Print: 31 MAR 2002

ISBN Information

Print ISBN: 9780471495321

Online ISBN: 9780470846599

SEARCH

Keywords:

  • autonomy;
  • brain-stem death;
  • conjoined twins;
  • death;
  • euthanasia;
  • hospice;
  • life;
  • permanent vegetative state;
  • resuscitation;
  • treatment

Summary

Modern medicine has brought huge benefits to human beings especially in the developed world. For many people life expectancy has been extended with a good quality of life. But with this has come the ability to sustain life when there is little or no prospect of recovery or of anything approaching a reasonable quality of life. Dying is being prolonged. Doctors and other health-workers have three duties in the face of this dilemma. First, to maintain a person's right to life, secondly to preserve their right to die and thirdly to distinguish between the two. It is against this background that individual decisions need to be made on when it is inappropriate to continue treatment. Further, society must make up its (collective) mind about whether a person's right to die should permit voluntary euthanasia, a practice for which both proponents and opponents can marshal cogent and logical arguments.