Chapter 9. Questioning GM Foods

  1. John Bryant Professor2,
  2. Dr Linda Baggott la Velle3,
  3. Revd Dr John Searle4
  1. Sue Mayer

Published Online: 18 APR 2002

DOI: 10.1002/0470846593.ch9

Bioethics for Scientists

Bioethics for Scientists

How to Cite

Mayer, S. (2002) Questioning GM Foods, in Bioethics for Scientists (eds J. Bryant, L. B. la Velle and J. Searle), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/0470846593.ch9

Editor Information

  1. 2

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

  2. 3

    Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

  3. 4

    Exeter & District Hospice, Exeter, UK

Author Information

  1. GeneWatch UK, The Mill House, Manchester Road, Tideswell, Derbyshire SK17 8LN, UK, Phone 01298 871898, Fax 01298 872531

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 18 APR 2002
  2. Published Print: 31 MAR 2002

ISBN Information

Print ISBN: 9780471495321

Online ISBN: 9780470846599

SEARCH

Keywords:

  • environment;
  • GM;
  • labelling;
  • opposition;
  • patent;
  • precautionary principle;
  • public;
  • regulation;
  • risk;
  • safety

Summary

There has been increasing public rejection of GM crops/food, especially in the UK. This rejection is not based on ignorance but on genuine issues that need addressing. Some people have intrinsic objections to GM technology itself but amongst the many who do not, concerns include risk (to health and to the environment), the role of purely commercial interests and the lack of consumer choice. For those who object to the technology, labelling of all GM foods is vital. Further, the possible risks make application of the precautionary principle absolutely necessary, recognising that our current knowledge is very incomplete. The view that objections to GM crops will prevent their application in alleviating world hunger is countered by the fact that the technology is in the hands of powerful commercial organisations that are in a strong position to exploit poorer countries. The whole topic needs widespread and open debate at all levels.