Standard Article

Interactions

  1. C. T. De Rosa Ph.D.,
  2. H. Hansen,
  3. S. Wilbur,
  4. H. R. Pohl,
  5. H. A. El-Masri,
  6. M. M. Mumtaz

Published Online: 16 APR 2001

DOI: 10.1002/0471435139.tox006

Patty's Toxicology

Patty's Toxicology

How to Cite

De Rosa, C. T., Hansen, H., Wilbur, S., Pohl, H. R., El-Masri, H. A. and Mumtaz, M. M. 2001. Interactions. Patty's Toxicology. 6.

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 16 APR 2001

This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (17 AUG 2012)

Abstract

We live in a chemical world, and exposure to xenobiotics is a fact of life. Humans are exposed daily to a variety of chemicals including but not limited to large categories of pesticides, pharmaceuticals, household products, and food additives. Chemical exposures can be intentional or unintentional, to a single chemical or to a mixture of chemicals. Exposures to environmental chemicals occur in populations living in inner cities near chemical manufacturing plants and hazardous waste sites, and in the near field runoffs from fields and fertilizers. An overturned cargo train or transportation truck can spill chemicals in a pristine environment and become a source of pollution, contamination, and exposure, and eventually lead to an emergency response event. Exposures to environmental chemicals can affect humans, animals, and plants. Thus people of various interests and backgrounds are concerned about environmental exposures. Everyone carries a body burden of chemicals that range from primary elements and radioactive materials to synthetic, persistent chemicals such as dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and certain chlorinated pesticides. The major issue is not whether we are being exposed to mixtures of chemicals, but whether these exposure levels exceed the body's ability to detoxify, adapt, or otherwise compensate.

Following a chemical exposure, the body exhibits a spectrum of biologic responses. For many chemicals, low-level human exposures do not produce observable health effects. Physiologically, the body adjusts to the presence of chemicals at this level through adaptive mechanisms. As chemical exposure increases, effects such as enzyme induction and certain biochemical and subcellular changes of uncertain significance may result. The body may have compensatory mechanisms at this level of chemical exposure. However, as chemical exposures continue to increase, observable adverse effects may ensue as the body exhausts its adaptive and compensatory mechanisms. Such adverse effects could lead to biochemical, pathophysiologic, histopathologic changes resulting in organ dysfunction. Exposure to higher levels of pollutants could lead to morbidity and mortality. Exposures from multiple sources or pathways may lower the threshold for adverse health effects along this continuum. Considering that humans generally lack homogeneity in biochemical characteristics, some groups within the population will be more susceptible to chemical exposures than others.

Thus it is important that exposure to environmental chemicals be viewed in the context of overall chemical exposures. The potential for combined chemical exposures to compromise physiologic systems may be greater in susceptible populations that include children, elderly persons, women of childbearing age, fetuses, persons with certain genetic disorders, and persons with preexisting infirmities.

Historically, health concerns from exposure to single chemicals drive criteria derivation procedures. Usually, the target chemical, or group of chemicals, is identified by a government agency, international organization, or an advisory body based on legislative mandate, evidence or potential for human risk, or community concerns. However, most exposures are not to single chemicals, but to complex mixtures of chemicals that can affect public health through multiple routes of exposure. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund) of 1980, the Clean Air Act of 1990, and the Food Quality and Protection Act of 1996 all mandate organizations and agencies to consider multiple chemical exposures, sequentially or simultaneously, while setting the criteria to protect public health from potential health effects of chemicals. Thus one has to consider comprehensive risk to populations that are exposed not only to a specific mixture but also to additional environmental agents and naturally occurring compounds that may enhance, inhibit, or contribute to the health risks posed by that mixture. In very few cases, the available information on a mixture and its components is reviewed and a criteria for the mixture are derived. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight issues relevant to the joint toxicity assessment of chemical mixtures through the use of representative published studies, to present the alternative experimental testing approaches for mixtures, and to promote the use of innovative techniques to advance joint toxicity assessment methods.

Keywords:

  • Environmental exposure;
  • Mixtures;
  • Exposure pathways;
  • Priority substances;
  • Joint toxic action;
  • Toxic equivalency factor;
  • Interactions;
  • Weight-of-evidence method;
  • Integral search system;
  • Consulation;
  • Experimental studies;
  • approaches;
  • Statistical procedures