Osteosarcoma of the hand: A clinicopathologic study of 12 cases

Authors

  • Kyoji Okada M.D.,

    1. Section of Surgical Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
    Current affiliation:
    1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University School of Medicine, 1–1–1 Hondo, Akita 010, Japan
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Visiting Clinician at the Section of Surgical Pathology.

  • Lester E. Wold M.D.,

    Corresponding author
    1. Section of Surgical Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
    • Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905
    Search for more papers by this author
  • John W. Beabout M.D.,

    1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Thomas C. Shives M.D.

    1. Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Background. The incidence of osteosarcoma of the hand is about 0.18% of all osteosarcomas.

Methods. This study describes the clinicopathologic profile of 12 patients (3 Mayo Clinic and 9 consultation) with osteosarcoma of the hand (13 tumors).

Results. The patients (six male patients, five female, one unknown) were from 16 to 81 years of age (average, 45). Seven tumors were in phalanges and six in metacarpals. Nine tumors were classified as conventional, one as low-grade intraosseous, one as osteoblastoma-like, one as high-grade surface, and one as periosteal osteosarcoma. Recurrent disease developed in all patients in whom the initial operation resulted in intralesional excision or a marginal margin but not in the five patients in whom the initial operation achieved wide margins. Only one patient died of metastatic disease.

Conclusions. The findings in this review support the conclusion that surgical treatment with a wide margin provides good results in patients with osteosarcoma of the hand.

Ancillary