SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Ries LAG, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Hartman AM, Edwards BK. Cancer statistics review 1973–88. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, NIH publication no. 91–2789, 1991: II14, 21; III14, 21.
  • 2
    United States General Accounting Office. Breast cancer 1971–91: prevention, treatment, and research. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office GAO/PEMD-92–12, 1992: 205.
  • 3
    White E, Lee CY, Kristal AR. Evaluation of the increase in breast cancer incidence in relation to mammography use. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 154652.
  • 4
    Glass AG, Hoover RN. Rising incidence of breast cancer: relationship to stage and receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 6936.
  • 5
    Liff JM, Sung JFC, Chow WH, Greenberg RS, Flanders WD. Does increased detection account for the rising incidence of breast cancer? Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 4625.
  • 6
    Swanson GM, Satariano ER, Satariano WA, Threatt BA. Racial differences in the early detection of breast cancer in Metropolitan Detroit, 1978 to 1987. Cancer 1990; 66: 1297301.
  • 7
    McWhorter WP, Eyre HJ. Impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1534.
  • 8
    Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Hankey BF. The increasing incidence of breast cancer since 1982: relevance of early detection. Cancer Causes and Control 1991; 2: 6774.
  • 9
    Holford TR, Roush GC, McKay LA. Trends in female breast cancer in Connecticut and the United States. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 41: 2939.
  • 10
    Lamtz PM, Remington PL, Newcomb PA. Mammography screening and increased incidence of breast cancer in Wisconsin. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83: 15406.
  • 11
    Kessler LG, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the breast cancer burden to American women: 1990–2000. Prev Med 1991; 20: 17082.
  • 12
    Bal DG, Price W. Trends in female breast cancer incidence, mortality, diagnosis and treatment, 1970–1986. Emeryville, CA: California Department of Health Services, San Francisco-Oakland Metropolitan Statistical Area, State of California, Technical Report no. 5, 1989: 411.
  • 13
    Henderson IC, Harris JR, Kinne DW, Hellman S. Cancer of the breast. In: DeVitaVTJr., HellmanS, RosenbergSA, editors. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1989: 1197268.
  • 14
    SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 edition. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, 1988: 51948.
  • 15
    National Cancer Institute. Extramural committee to assess measures of progress against cancer: special report. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 82535.
  • 16
    Howard J. Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential. CA 1987; 37: 3348.
  • 17
    The NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? JAMA 1990; 264: 548.
  • 18
    Marchant DJ, Sutton SM. Use of mammography: United States, 1990. MMWR 1990; 39: 621: 627–30.
  • 19
    Anda RF, Waller MN, Wooten KG, Mast EE, Escobedo LG, Sanderson LM. Behavioral risk factor surveillance, 1988. MMWR 1990; 39SS-2: 121.
  • 20
    Ackerman SP, Brackbill RM, Bewerse BA, Sanderson LM. Cancer screening behaviors among U. S. women: breast cancer, 1987–1989, and cervical cancer, 1988–1989. MMWR 1992; 41SS-2: 1734.
  • 21
    Brown ML, Kessler LG, Rueter FG. Is the supply of mammography machines outstripping need and demand? Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 54752.