The Mini-Cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly
Article first published online: 23 NOV 2000
Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume 15, Issue 11, pages 1021–1027, November 2000
How to Cite
Borson, S., Scanlan, J., Brush, M., Vitaliano, P. and Dokmak, A. (2000), The Mini-Cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int. J. Geriat. Psychiatry, 15: 1021–1027. doi: 10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<1021::AID-GPS234>3.0.CO;2-6
- Issue published online: 23 NOV 2000
- Article first published online: 23 NOV 2000
- Manuscript Accepted: 25 JAN 2000
- Manuscript Received: 8 NOV 1999
- National Institute of Aging. Grant Number: P50 AG 05136
- National Institute of Mental Health. Grant Number: RO1 MH 57663
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- dementia screening;
- clock drawing;
- three-item recall;
- Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument, CASI;
Objectives. The Mini-Cog, a composite of three-item recall and clock drawing, was developed as a brief test for discriminating demented from non-demented persons in a community sample of culturally, linguistically, and educationally heterogeneous older adults.
Subjects. All 129 who met criteria for probable dementia based on informant interviews and 120 with no history of cognitive decline were included; 124 were non-English speakers.
Methods. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic value of the Mini-Cog were compared with those of the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI).
Results. The Mini-Cog had the highest sensitivity (99%) and correctly classified the greatest percentage (96%) of subjects. Moreover, its diagnostic value was not influenced by education or language, while that of the CASI was adversely influenced by low education, and both education and language compromised the diagnostic value of the MMSE. Administration time for the Mini-Cog was 3 minutes vs 7 minutes for the MMSE.
Conclusions. The Mini-Cog required minimal language interpretation and training to administer, and no test forms of scoring modifications were needed to compensate for the extensive linguistic and educational heterogeneity of the sample. Validation in clinical and population-based samples is warranted, as its brevity and ease of administration suggest that the Mini-Cog might be readily incorporated into general practice and senior care settings as a routine ‘cognitive vital signs’ measure. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.