Developing a systemic model for the evaluation of conflicts*

Authors

  • Luis Pinzón,

    Corresponding author
    1. Centre for Systems Studies, Hull University Business School, University of Hull, UK
    • Centre for Systems Studies, Hull University Business School, University of Hull, 63 Salmon Grove, Hull HU6 7SZ, UK.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Gerald Midgley

    1. Centre for Systems Studies, Hull University Business School, University of Hull, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

  • *

    The first draft of this paper was prepared at the Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia.

Abstract

This paper aims to challenge reductionist mental models widely used to evaluate the effects of conflicts or disputes. These models are frequently used intuitively by people, or recommended in the dispute resolution literature in fields such as negotiation or mediation. It is argued that they harm people's ability to deal effectively with conflicts and learn from them. The authors propose an alternative systemic framework for evaluating the results of conflicts, which is illustrated by making reference to a severe conflict, the Colombian guerrilla war. This case serves to show the advantages of using the proposed framework instead of more traditional models. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ancillary