This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (16 JUN 2010)

Intervention Review

Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair

  1. Christine Kettle1,*,
  2. Richard Johanson2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 8 OCT 2008

Assessed as up-to-date: 30 JUN 1999

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006

Database Title

Additional Information

How to Cite

Kettle C, Johanson R. Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000006. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006.

Author Information

  1. 1

    North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Maternity Hospital, Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK

  2. 2

    (Deceased) North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

*Christine Kettle, Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Maternity Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 6QG, UK. christine.kettle@uhns.nhs.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 8 OCT 2008

SEARCH

ARTICLE TOOLS

This is not the most recent version of the article.View current version (16 Jun 2010)

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (54K)Standard (219K)Full (261K)

  1. Current Version

    Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears

    Christine Kettle, Therese Dowswell and Khaled MK Ismail

    Article first published online: 16 JUN 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair

    Christine Kettle and Richard Johanson

    Article first published online: 8 OCT 2008 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (54K)Standard (219K)Full (261K)