Intervention Review

Family intervention for schizophrenia

  1. Fiona Pharoah1,*,
  2. Jair Mari2,
  3. John Rathbone3,
  4. Winson Wong4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Schizophrenia Group

Published Online: 28 JUL 2011

Assessed as up-to-date: 14 JAN 2010

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000088.pub3

How to Cite

Pharoah F, Mari J, Rathbone J, Wong W. Family intervention for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD000088. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000088.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Oxford and Buckinghamshire Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, South West Community Mental Health Team, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, UK

  2. 2

    UNIFESP, Departamento de Psiquiatria, CEP 04023-900 Sao Paulo, Brazil

  3. 3

    The University of Sheffield, HEDS, ScHARR, Sheffield, UK

  4. 4

    Yorkshire and Humber Postgraduate Deanery, Sheffield, UK

*Fiona Pharoah, South West Community Mental Health Team, Oxford and Buckinghamshire Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Apex 550 (Unit 5), The Valley Centre, Gordon Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP13 6EQ, UK. fiona.pharoah@obmh.nhs.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed)
  2. Published Online: 28 JUL 2011

SEARCH

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary
  4. Resumen

Background

People with schizophrenia from families that express high levels of criticism, hostility, or over involvement, have more frequent relapses than people with similar problems from families that tend to be less expressive of emotions. Forms of psychosocial intervention, designed to reduce these levels of expressed emotions within families, are now widely used.

Objectives

To estimate the effects of family psychosocial interventions in community settings for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like conditions compared with standard care.

Search methods

We updated previous searches by searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (September 2008).

Selection criteria

We selected randomised or quasi-randomised studies focusing primarily on families of people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder that compared community-orientated family-based psychosocial intervention with standard care.

Data collection and analysis

We independently extracted data and calculated fixed-effect relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary data, and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD).

Main results

This 2009-10 update adds 21 additional studies, with a total of 53 randomised controlled trials included. Family intervention may decrease the frequency of relapse (n = 2981, 32 RCTs, RR 0.55 CI 0.5 to 0.6, NNT 7 CI 6 to 8), although some small but negative studies might not have been identified by the search. Family intervention may also reduce hospital admission (n = 481, 8 RCTs, RR 0.78 CI 0.6 to 1.0, NNT 8 CI 6 to 13) and encourage compliance with medication (n = 695, 10 RCTs, RR 0.60 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 6 CI 5 to 9) but it does not obviously affect the tendency of individuals/families to leave care (n = 733, 10 RCTs, RR 0.74 CI 0.5 to 1.0). Family intervention also seems to improve general social impairment and the levels of expressed emotion within the family. We did not find data to suggest that family intervention either prevents or promotes suicide.

Authors' conclusions

Family intervention may reduce the number of relapse events and hospitalisations and would therefore be of interest to people with schizophrenia, clinicians and policy makers. However, the treatment effects of these trials may be overestimated due to the poor methodological quality. Further data from trials that describe the methods of randomisation, test the blindness of the study evaluators, and implement the CONSORT guidelines would enable greater confidence in these findings.

 

Plain language summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary
  4. Resumen

Family intervention for schizophrenia

People with schizophrenia are more likely to experience a relapse within family groups when there are high levels of expressed emotion (hostility, criticism or over involvement) within the family, compared to families who tend to be less expressive of their emotions. There are several psychosocial interventions available involving education, support and management to reduce expressed emotion within families. In this review we compare the effects of family psychosocial interventions in community settings for the care of people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses.

Studies were conducted in Europe, Asia and North America with packages of family intervention varying among studies, although there were no clear differences in study design. Results indicated that family intervention may reduce the risk of relapse and improve compliance with medication. However data were often inadequately reported and therefore unusable. As this package of care is widely employed, there should be further research to properly clarify several of the short-term and long-term outcomes.

 

Resumen

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary
  4. Resumen

Antecedentes

Intervención familiar para la esquizofrenia

Los pacientes con esquizofrenia de familias que expresan altos niveles de censura, hostilidad o implicación excesiva, tienen recurrencias más frecuentes que los pacientes con problemas similares provenientes de familias que tienden a expresar las emociones en menor medida. En la actualidad, se utilizan ampliamente intervenciones psicosociales para reducir estos niveles de expresión de las emociones en las familias.

Objetivos

Calcular los efectos de las intervenciones psicosociales familiares en ámbitos comunitarios para la atención de pacientes con esquizofrenia o enfermedades similares a la esquizofrenia, en comparación con la atención estándar.

Estrategia de búsqueda

Se actualizaron las búsquedas anteriores con el Registro de Ensayos del Grupo Cochrane de Esquizofrenia (Cochrane Schizophrenia Group) (septiembre de 2008).

Criterios de selección

Se seleccionaron estudios aleatorios o cuasialeatorios centrados principalmente en las familias de los pacientes con esquizofrenia o con trastorno esquizoafectivo, que compararon la intervención psicosocial familiar de orientación comunitaria con la atención estándar.

Obtención y análisis de los datos

Se extrajeron los datos de forma independiente y se calculó el riesgo relativo (RR) con el modelo de efectos fijos, los intervalos de confianza (IC) del 95% para los datos binarios y, cuando correspondía, el número necesario a tratar (NNT) sobre una base de intención de tratar. Para los datos continuos, se calcularon las diferencias de medias (DM).

Resultados principales

Esta actualización 2009/2010 agrega 21 estudios adicionales, con un total de 53 ensayos controlados aleatorios incluidos. La intervención familiar puede reducir la frecuencia de recurrencias (n = 2981; 32 ECA; RR 0,55; IC: 0,5 a 0,6; NNT 7; IC: 6 a 8), aunque pueden no haberse identificado en la búsqueda algunos estudios pequeños pero negativos. La intervención familiar también puede reducir los ingresos al hospital (n = 481, 8 ECA, RR 0,78; IC: 0,6 a 1,0; NNT 8; IC: 6 a 13) y estimular el cumplimiento con la medicación (n = 695, 10 ECA, RR 0,60; IC: 0,5 a 0,7; NNT 6; IC: 5 a 9), pero no afecta de una manera notable la tendencia de los individuos y sus familias a abandonar la atención (n = 733, 10 ECA, RR 0,74; IC: 0,5 a 1,0). Además, la intervención familiar parece mejorar el deterioro social general y los niveles de emoción expresada dentro de la familia. No se encontraron datos para sugerir que la intervención familiar previene o promueve el suicidio.

Conclusiones de los autores

La intervención familiar puede reducir el número de recurrencias y hospitalizaciones y, por lo tanto, sería de interés para los pacientes con esquizofrenia, los médicos y los elaboradores de políticas. Sin embargo, pueden sobrestimarse los efectos de tratamiento de estos ensayos debido a la deficiente calidad metodológica. Los datos adicionales de los ensayos que describan los métodos de asignación al azar, prueben el cegamiento de los evaluadores de los estudios y apliquen las guías CONSORT permitirían mayor confianza en estos resultados.

Traducción

Traducción realizada por el Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano