Intervention Review

Audit and feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

  1. Mary Ann O'Brien1,*,
  2. Andrew D Oxman2,
  3. Dave Davis3,
  4. R. Brian Haynes4,
  5. Nick Freemantle5,
  6. Emma Harvey6

Editorial Group: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group

Published Online: 26 JAN 1998

Assessed as up-to-date: 23 NOV 1997

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000260

How to Cite

O'Brien MA, Oxman AD, Davis D, Haynes RB, Freemantle N, Harvey E. Audit and feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000260. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000260.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Juravinski Cancer Centre, Supportive Cancer Care Research Unit, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

  2. 2

    Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Health Services, Oslo, Norway

  3. 3

    Association of American Medical Colleges, Continuing Health Care Education and Improvement, Washington, DC, USA

  4. 4

    McMaster University, Departments of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

  5. 5

    University of Birmingham, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Birmingham, UK

  6. 6

    SaltaSustainable, Leeds, UK

*Mary Ann O'Brien, Supportive Cancer Care Research Unit, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2, Canada. maryann.o'brien@jcc.hhsc.ca.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Withdrawn from publication for reasons stated in the review
  2. Published Online: 26 JAN 1998

SEARCH

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Joy C. MacDermid, Ian D. Graham, Knowledge Translation: Putting the “Practice” in Evidence-Based Practice, Hand Clinics, 2009, 25, 1, 125

    CrossRef