Intervention Review

Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour

  1. Millicent Anim-Somuah1,*,
  2. Rebecca MD Smyth2,
  3. Leanne Jones3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 7 DEC 2011

Assessed as up-to-date: 30 SEP 2011

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3

How to Cite

Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD000331. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK

  2. 2

    The University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester, UK

  3. 3

    The University of Liverpool, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Liverpool, UK

*Millicent Anim-Somuah, Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Fountain Street, Ashton-under-Lyne, OL6 9RW, UK. ma.somuah@tgh.nhs.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 7 DEC 2011

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour

    Millicent Anim-Somuah, Rebecca MD Smyth and Leanne Jones

    Article first published online: 7 DEC 2011 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 2

    Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour

    Millicent Anim-Somuah, Rebecca MD Smyth and Charlotte J Howell

    Article first published online: 21 JAN 2009 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub2

  2. Version 1

    Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour

    CJ Howell

    Article first published online: 20 JUL 2005 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331