Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Condylocephalic nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures

  1. Martyn J Parker1,*,
  2. Helen HG Handoll2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group

Published Online: 26 OCT 1998

Assessed as up-to-date: 14 DEC 2004

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000338


How to Cite

Parker MJ, Handoll HHG. Condylocephalic nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000338. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000338.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Orthopaedic Department, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK

  2. 2

    University of Teesside, Centre for Rehabilitation Sciences (CRS), Research Institute for Health Sciences and Social Care, Middlesborough, Tees Valley, UK

*Martyn J Parker, Orthopaedic Department, Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough District Hospital, Thorpe Road, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, PE3 6DA, UK. martyn.parker@pbh-tr.nhs.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 26 OCT 1998

SEARCH

[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 1 Length of surgery (minutes).
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 2 Operative blood loss (ml).
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 3 Radiographic screening time (seconds).
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 4 Cut-out of implant.
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 5 Cut-out of implant (odds ratio results).
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 6 Backing out of the nail.
[Analysis 1.7]
Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 7 Non-union.
[Analysis 1.8]
Analysis 1.8. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 8 Fracture of the femur.
[Analysis 1.9]
Analysis 1.9. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 9 Reoperation.
[Analysis 1.10]
Analysis 1.10. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 10 Reoperation: by allocation concealment (quality score).
[Analysis 1.11]
Analysis 1.11. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 11 Reoperation: by overall trial quality (total score).
[Analysis 1.12]
Analysis 1.12. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 12 Superficial wound infection.
[Analysis 1.13]
Analysis 1.13. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 13 Deep wound infection.
[Analysis 1.14]
Analysis 1.14. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 14 Pneumonia.
[Analysis 1.15]
Analysis 1.15. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 15 Pressure sores.
[Analysis 1.16]
Analysis 1.16. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 16 DVT (deep vein thrombosis).
[Analysis 1.17]
Analysis 1.17. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 17 Pulmonary embolism.
[Analysis 1.18]
Analysis 1.18. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 18 Any medical complications.
[Analysis 1.19]
Analysis 1.19. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 19 External rotation deformity.
[Analysis 1.20]
Analysis 1.20. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 20 Shortening of leg.
[Analysis 1.21]
Analysis 1.21. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 21 Mortality: short term (<2 months).
[Analysis 1.22]
Analysis 1.22. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 22 Mortality: long term follow up.
[Analysis 1.23]
Analysis 1.23. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 23 Pain at follow up: any (knee, hip).
[Analysis 1.24]
Analysis 1.24. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 24 Pain at follow up: hip pain.
[Analysis 1.25]
Analysis 1.25. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 25 Failure to return previous residence.
[Analysis 1.26]
Analysis 1.26. Comparison 1 Ender nails versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 26 Deterioration in walking function.
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Harris nail versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 1 Non-union.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Harris nail versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 2 Fixation failure rate.
[Analysis 2.3]
Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Harris nail versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 3 Reoperation.
[Analysis 2.4]
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Harris nail versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 4 Mortality: long term.
[Analysis 2.5]
Analysis 2.5. Comparison 2 Harris nail versus extramedullary fixation implants, Outcome 5 Failure to regain mobility.