This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (18 JAN 2012)

Intervention Review

Life skills programmes for chronic mental illnesses

  1. Patraporn Tungpunkom1,*,
  2. Margaret Nicol2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Schizophrenia Group

Published Online: 23 APR 2008

Assessed as up-to-date: 19 FEB 2008

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000381.pub2


How to Cite

Tungpunkom P, Nicol M. Life skills programmes for chronic mental illnesses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000381. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000381.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Chiang Mai University, Faculty of Nursing, Chiang mai, Thailand

  2. 2

    Queen Margaret College, Department of Occupational Therapy, Edinburgh, UK

*Patraporn Tungpunkom, Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthawaroros Street, Muang, Chiang mai, 50200, Thailand. patrapor@mail.nurse.cmu.ac.th.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 23 APR 2008

SEARCH

This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (18 JAN 2012)

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Background

Most people with schizophrenia have a cyclical pattern of illness characterised by remission and relapses. The illness can reduce the ability of self-care and functioning and can lead to the illness becoming chronic and disabling. Rehabilitation is one of the important parts of treatments. Life skills programmes, emphasising the needs associated with independent functioning, are often a part of the rehabilitation process. These programmes, therefore, have been developed to enhance independent living and the quality of life for people with schizophrenia living in the community.

Objectives

To review the effectiveness of life skills programmes with standard care or other comparable therapies for people with chronic mental health problems.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (May 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. Hand searches and scrutiny of references supplemented this process. We inspected references of all identified studies for further trials.

Selection criteria

We included all relevant randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials for life skills programmes versus other comparable therapies or standard care involving people with serious mental illnesses.

Data collection and analysis

We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a random effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a random effects model.

Main results

We included four randomised controlled trials with a total of 318 participants. These evaluated life skills programmes versus standard care, or support group. We found no significant difference in life skills performance between people given life skills training and standard care (Patterson 2003, n=32, WMD -1.10 CI -7.8 to 5.6). Life skills training did not improve or worsen study retention (n=60, 2 RCTs, RR 1.16 CI 0.4 to 3.4). We found no significant difference in PANSS positive, negative or total scores between life skills intervention and standard care. Depression scores (HAM-D) did not reveal any significant difference between groups (Patterson 2003, n=32, WMD -0.70 CI -4.1 to 2.7). We found quality of life scores to be equivocal between participants given life skills training (Patterson 2003, n=32, WMD -0.02 CI -0.1 to 0.03) and standard care. Life skills compared with support groups also did not reveal any significant differences in PANSS scores, quality of life, or social performance skills (Patterson 2006, n=158, WMD -0.90 CI -3.4 to 1.6).

Authors' conclusions

Currently there is no good evidence to suggest life skills programmes are effective for people with chronic mental illnesses. More robust data are needed from studies that are adequately powered to determine whether life skills training is beneficial for people with chronic mental health problems.

 

Plain language summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Life skills programmes for chronic mental illnesses

The majority of people with schizophrenia have a pattern of illness where they relapse and then have a remission.  A significant number of these people become less able to look after themselves after each relapse and their lack of self-care and poorer functioning causes them to become more disabled and isolated.  One possible way of helping these people, alongside medication, is to teach them life skills, the components of which are communication and financial awareness, competence in domestic tasks and personal self-care.  This review looks at trials comparing life skills programmes to a control group who have access to occupational therapy, or a peer support group, where people who have a chronic mental illness were facilitated to help each other.  Four trials were found with a total of 318 participants most of whom had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizophrenia like disorders.  The longest trial was 24 weeks and the shortest was 7 weeks.  The outcomes measured were improvement of general and specific skills, improvement of symptoms and a better quality of life.  None of these outcomes were significantly different between the life skills, peer support and control groups although the four trials were often measuring them in different ways, making comparison difficult.  In addition, the number of people in two of the studies was very small, making it unlikely that differences would be seen between the two groups.  To assess whether life skills programmes are beneficial to those with chronic mental health problems a large trial should be done using well researched scales to measure the outcomes.  

(Plain language summary prepared for this review by Janey Antoniou of RETHINK, UK www.rethink.org)