Intervention Review

Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy

  1. Therese Dowswell2,
  2. Guillermo Carroli3,
  3. Lelia Duley1,*,
  4. Simon Gates4,
  5. A Metin Gülmezoglu5,
  6. Dina Khan-Neelofur6,
  7. Gilda GP Piaggio7

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 6 OCT 2010

Assessed as up-to-date: 7 JUN 2010

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub2


How to Cite

Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio GGP. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000934. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Nottingham, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham, UK

  2. 2

    The University of Liverpool, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Liverpool, UK

  3. 3

    Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina

  4. 4

    Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, UK

  5. 5

    World Health Organization, UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Geneva, Switzerland

  6. 6

    Ras Beirut, Lebanon

  7. 7

    World Health Organization, Special Programme of Research Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, RHR., Geneva, Switzerland

*Lelia Duley, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, B39, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. lelia.duley@nottingham.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 6 OCT 2010

SEARCH

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Jacqueline C.K. Tsang, Nia Wyn Jones, Antepartum fetal health, Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 2014, 24, 3, 80

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Mary J Renfrew, Alison McFadden, Maria Helena Bastos, James Campbell, Andrew Amos Channon, Ngai Fen Cheung, Deborah Rachel Audebert Delage Silva, Soo Downe, Holly Powell Kennedy, Address Malata, Felicia McCormick, Laura Wick, Eugene Declercq, Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care, The Lancet, 2014, 384, 9948, 1129

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Cynthia H Chuang, Erika S Poole, Tamara Peyton, Ian Blubaugh, Jaimey Pauli, Alyssa Feher, Madhu Reddy, Paging “Dr. Google”: Does Technology Fill the Gap Created by the Prenatal Care Visit Structure? Qualitative Focus Group Study With Pregnant Women, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2014, 16, 6, e147

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Tamsen J. Rochat, Mark Tomlinson, Marie -Louise Newell, Alan Stein, Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Archives of Women's Mental Health, 2013, 16, 5, 401

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Jane Warland, Keeping baby SAFE in pregnancy: Evaluating the brochure, Midwifery, 2013, 29, 2, 174

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Ingegerd Hildingsson, Helen Haines, Maddalena Cross, Julie F. Pallant, Christine Rubertsson, Women's satisfaction with antenatal care: Comparing women in Sweden and Australia, Women and Birth, 2013, 26, 1, e9

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Klaus Vetter, Maren Goeckenjan, Facharzt Geburtsmedizin, 2012,

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Carrie E. Neerland, A Supportive Approach to Prenatal Care,
  9. 9
    Debarati Dutta, Medha Sule, Amita Ray, Epidural therapy for the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia in non labouring women, The Cochrane Library,
  10. 10
    Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Kesso Habiba Garga, Pierre Ongolo-Zogo, Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes, The Cochrane Library,