Intervention Review

Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears

  1. Christine Kettle1,*,
  2. Robert K Hills2,
  3. Khaled MK Ismail3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 21 JAN 2009

Assessed as up-to-date: 11 JUL 2007

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947.pub2

How to Cite

Kettle C, Hills RK, Ismail KMK. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000947. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Maternity Hospital, Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK

  2. 2

    University of Birmingham, Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, UK

  3. 3

    Keele University Medical School, University Hospital of North Staffordshire , Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stoke-on-Trent , UK

*Christine Kettle, Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Maternity Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 6QG, UK. christine.kettle@uhns.nhs.uk . chrisk16@tiscali.co.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 21 JAN 2009

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears

    Christine Kettle, Robert K Hills and Khaled MK Ismail

    Article first published online: 21 JAN 2009 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Continuous versus interrupted sutures for perineal repair

    C Kettle and RB Johanson

    Article first published online: 18 JUL 2007 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947