This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (28 MAR 2013)

Intervention Review

Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

  1. William McGuire1,*,
  2. Sarah Bombell2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Neonatal Group

Published Online: 23 APR 2008

Assessed as up-to-date: 10 JAN 2008

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001241.pub2

How to Cite

McGuire W, Bombell S. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD001241. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001241.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Australian National University Medical School, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Canberra, ACT 2606, Australia

  2. 2

    Australian National University, Centre for Newborn Care, Canberra, Australia

*William McGuire, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra Hospital Campus, Canberra, ACT 2606, Australia. william.mcguire@act.gov.au.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 23 APR 2008

SEARCH

This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (28 MAR 2013)

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Background

The major modifiable risk factors for necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants relate to enteral feeding regimens. Observational studies suggest that conservative feeding regimens such as delaying the introduction of enteral feeds or slowly advancing feed volumes reduce the risk of necrotising enterocolitis

Objectives

To determine the effect of slow rates of enteral feed advancement on the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis, mortality and other morbidities in very low birth weight infants.

Search strategy

The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Group was used. Searches were made of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 - December 2007), EMBASE (1980 - December 2007), CINAHL (1982- December 2007), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.

Selection criteria

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of slow (up to 24 ml/kg/day) versus faster rates of advancement of enteral feed volumes upon the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants.

Data collection and analysis

The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Group were used, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two authors. Data were synthesised using a fixed effects model and reported using typical relative risk, typical risk difference and weighted mean difference.

Main results

Three randomised controlled trials in which a total of 396 infants participated were identified. Few participants were extremely low birth weight or growth restricted. The trials were generally of good methodological quality but caregivers and investigators were aware of the allocated interventions. Meta-analyses did not detect statistically significant effects on the risk of necrotising enterocolitis [typical relative risk 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.48 to 1.92); typical risk difference 0.00 (95% confidence interval -0.05 to 0.05)] or all cause mortality [typical relative risk 1.40 (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 2.80); typical risk difference 0.03 (95% confidence interval -0.03 to 0.10)]. Infants who had slow rates of feed volume advancement took longer to regain birth weight [reported median difference between two and five days] and to establish full enteral feeding [reported median difference between three and five days]. No statistically significant effect on the total duration of hospital stay was detected.

Authors' conclusions

The currently available data do not provide evidence that slow advancement of enteral feed volumes reduces the risk of necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Increasing the volume of enteral feeds at slow rather than faster rates results in several days delay in regaining birth weight and establishing full enteral feeds but the long-term clinical importance of these effects is unclear. Further randomised controlled trials are needed to determine how the rate of daily increment in enteral feed volumes affects important clinical outcomes in very low birth weight infants, and particularly in extremely low birth weight or growth restricted infants.

 

Plain language summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

There is insufficient evidence to determine whether slowly advancing the volume of milk feeds given to very low birth weight infants reduces the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis.Very low birth weight infants (birth weight less than 1500 grams) are at risk of developing a severe bowel disorder called "necrotising enterocolitis". It is thought that one possible way to prevent this condition is to limit the amount of milk feeds that infants receive each day for the first few weeks after birth. However, only three trials have assessed the effect of slowly (rather than more quickly) increasing the volume of milk feeds given to very low birth weight infants. Analysis of these trials did not reveal any effect on the risk of necrotising enterocolitis. Further trials that assess the effect of varying the rate at which the amount of milk given to very low birth weight infants is increased are needed.