Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

School-based programmes for preventing smoking

  1. Roger E Thomas1,*,
  2. Julie McLellan2,
  3. Rafael Perera2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group

Published Online: 30 APR 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 5 FEB 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3


How to Cite

Thomas RE, McLellan J, Perera R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001293. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Calgary, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

  2. 2

    University of Oxford, Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK

*Roger E Thomas, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, UCMC, #1707-1632 14th Avenue, Calgary, Alberta, T2M 1N7, Canada. rthomas@ucalgary.ca.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 30 APR 2013

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Flow chart of retrieval and identification of Group 1, 2 and 3 studies.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies, whether or not they had analysable data. The non-coloured section of each bar represents different arms of multiple-arm studies, for which risk of bias is assessed as a single measure for each study.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Forest plot of comparison: 1 All curricula versus control, outcome: 1.2 Group 1: Pure Prevention cohorts (adjusted) at longest follow-up.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 All curricula versus control, Outcome 1 Group 1: Pure Prevention cohort (adjusted) - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 All curricula versus control, Outcome 2 Group 1: Pure Prevention cohort (adjusted) - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 All curricula versus control, Outcome 3 Group 2: Change in Smoking Behaviour over time - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 All curricula versus control, Outcome 4 Group 2: Change in Smoking Behaviour over time - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 All curricula versus control, Outcome 5 Group 3: Point Prevalence of Smoking - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 All curricula versus control, Outcome 6 Group 3: Point Prevalence of Smoking - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Group 1: Sensitivity analyses (adjusted), Outcome 1 Low attrition - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Group 1: Sensitivity analyses (adjusted), Outcome 2 Low attrition - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 2.3]
Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Group 1: Sensitivity analyses (adjusted), Outcome 3 Low & unclear attrition - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 2.4]
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Group 1: Sensitivity analyses (adjusted), Outcome 4 Low & unclear attrition- longest follow-up.
[Analysis 2.5]
Analysis 2.5. Comparison 2 Group 1: Sensitivity analyses (adjusted), Outcome 5 Low selection bias - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 2.6]
Analysis 2.6. Comparison 2 Group 1: Sensitivity analyses (adjusted), Outcome 6 Low selection bias - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 3.1]
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Group 1: Gender analysis, Outcome 1 Female - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 3.2]
Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 Group 1: Gender analysis, Outcome 2 Female - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 3.3]
Analysis 3.3. Comparison 3 Group 1: Gender analysis, Outcome 3 Male - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 3.4]
Analysis 3.4. Comparison 3 Group 1: Gender analysis, Outcome 4 Male - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 4.1]
Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 Group 1: Booster sessions analysis, Outcome 1 No Booster sessions - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 4.2]
Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4 Group 1: Booster sessions analysis, Outcome 2 No Booster sessions - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 4.3]
Analysis 4.3. Comparison 4 Group 1: Booster sessions analysis, Outcome 3 Boosters sessions - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 4.4]
Analysis 4.4. Comparison 4 Group 1: Booster sessions analysis, Outcome 4 Booster sessions - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 5.1]
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Group 1: Tobacco focus, Outcome 1 Multi foci - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 5.2]
Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 Group 1: Tobacco focus, Outcome 2 Multi foci - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 5.3]
Analysis 5.3. Comparison 5 Group 1: Tobacco focus, Outcome 3 Tobacco focused - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 5.4]
Analysis 5.4. Comparison 5 Group 1: Tobacco focus, Outcome 4 Tobacco focused - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 6.1]
Analysis 6.1. Comparison 6 Group 1: Peer-led analysis, Outcome 1 Peer-led - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 6.2]
Analysis 6.2. Comparison 6 Group 1: Peer-led analysis, Outcome 2 Peer-led - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 6.3]
Analysis 6.3. Comparison 6 Group 1: Peer-led analysis, Outcome 3 Adult-led - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 6.4]
Analysis 6.4. Comparison 6 Group 1: Peer-led analysis, Outcome 4 Adult-led - longest follow-up.
[Analysis 7.1]
Analysis 7.1. Comparison 7 Group 2: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 1 Low attrition - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 7.2]
Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7 Group 2: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 2 Low attrition - > 1 year, longest follow-up.
[Analysis 7.3]
Analysis 7.3. Comparison 7 Group 2: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 3 Low & unclear attrition - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 7.4]
Analysis 7.4. Comparison 7 Group 2: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 4 Low & unclear attrition - > 1 year, longest follow-up.
[Analysis 7.5]
Analysis 7.5. Comparison 7 Group 2: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 5 Low selection bias - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 7.6]
Analysis 7.6. Comparison 7 Group 2: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 6 Low selection bias - > 1 year, longest follow-up.
[Analysis 8.1]
Analysis 8.1. Comparison 8 Group 3: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 1 Low attrition - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 8.2]
Analysis 8.2. Comparison 8 Group 3: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 2 Low attrition - > 1 year, longest follow-up.
[Analysis 8.3]
Analysis 8.3. Comparison 8 Group 3: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 3 Low & unclear attrition - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 8.4]
Analysis 8.4. Comparison 8 Group 3: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 4 Low & unclear attrition - > 1 year, longest follow-up.
[Analysis 8.5]
Analysis 8.5. Comparison 8 Group 3: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 5 Low selection bias - 1 year or less.
[Analysis 8.6]
Analysis 8.6. Comparison 8 Group 3: Sensitivity analyses, Outcome 6 Low selection bias - > 1 year, longest follow-up.