Intervention Review

Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods for preventing pregnancy

  1. Jo Power1,*,
  2. Rebecca French2,
  3. Frances M. Cowan3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group

Published Online: 16 JUL 2008

Assessed as up-to-date: 22 APR 2007

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001326.pub2

How to Cite

Power J, French R, Cowan FM. Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods for preventing pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001326. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001326.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Margaret Pyke Centre, London, UK

  2. 2

    London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Public and Environmental Health Research Unit, London, UK

  3. 3

    University College London, Centre for Sexual Health& HIV Research, Research Department of Infection & Population Sciences, London, UK

*Jo Power, Margaret Pyke Centre, 73 Charlotte Street, London, W1T 4PL, UK. jopower@nhs.net.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 16 JUL 2008

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods for preventing pregnancy

    Jo Power, Rebecca French and Frances M. Cowan

    Article first published online: 16 JUL 2008 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001326.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy

    R French, C Cowan, D Mansour, D Hughes, A Robinson, J Guillebaud, C Summerbell, S Logan and T Proctor

    Article first published online: 18 APR 2007 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001326