This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (17 FEB 2010)
Intervention Review
Routine intracranial pressure monitoring in acute coma
Editorial Group: Cochrane Injuries Group
Published Online: 21 JAN 2009
Assessed as up-to-date: 31 MAR 2006
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002043
Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Database Title
Additional Information
How to Cite
Forsyth RJ, Rodriguez B. Routine intracranial pressure monitoring in acute coma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002043. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002043.
Publication History
- Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
- Published Online: 21 JAN 2009
This is not the most recent version of the article.View current version (17 Feb 2010)
Abstract
Background
Studies in traumatic encephalopathy first led to the insight that the damage seen was not just due to direct consequences of the primary injury. A significant, and potentially preventable, contribution to the overall morbidity arose from secondary hypoxic-ischaemic damage. Brain swelling accompanied by raised intracranial pressure (ICP) resulted in inadequate cerebral perfusion with well-oxygenated blood. Detection of raised ICP could be useful in alerting clinicians to the need to improve cerebral perfusion, with consequent reductions in brain injury.
Objectives
To determine whether routine ICP monitoring in all acute cases of severe coma reduces the risk of all-cause mortality or severe disability at final follow-up.
Search strategy
We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Index of Scientific and Technical Proceedings. We also checked the reference lists of all relevant articles. The searches were last updated in April 2006.
Selection criteria
All randomised controlled studies of real-time ICP monitoring by invasive or semi-invasive means in acute coma (traumatic or non-traumatic aetiology) versus no ICP monitoring (that is, clinical assessment of ICP).
Data collection and analysis
Primary outcome measures were all-cause mortality and severe disability at the end of the follow-up period.
Main results
No studies meeting the selection criteria have been identified to date.
Authors' conclusions
There are no data from randomised controlled trials that can clarify the role of ICP monitoring in acute coma.
Plain language summary
No evidence from trials to show the effects of routine monitoring of intracranial pressure following head injury
The brain is situated in a rigid box (the skull) that cannot expand, so normal swelling from injury cannot occur. When brain swelling does occur, pressure inside the skull rises. This makes it harder for the heart to pump the oxygen and blood into the brain needed for recovery. If this swelling is not controlled, further brain damage is caused. Efforts to avoid this damage can include routine monitoring of the pressure inside the skull (intracranial). The review of trials found no evidence to show the effects of routine measurement of pressure in the skull. More research is needed.
