Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus

  1. Qin Liu2,
  2. Ratana Panpanich1,*

Editorial Group: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group

Published Online: 21 JAN 2009

Assessed as up-to-date: 25 MAY 2010

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002150

How to Cite

Liu Q, Panpanich R. Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002150. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002150.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Faculty of Medicine, Community Medicine, Chiang Mai, North, Thailand

  2. 2

    School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Effective Healthcare Research Programme Consortium China (Chongqing) RPC Programme, Chongqing, China

*Ratana Panpanich, Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Chiang Mai, North, 50200, Thailand. rpanpani@mail.med.cmu.ac.th.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 21 JAN 2009

SEARCH

 
Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Brown 1978

MethodsRandomized controlled trial


Participants149 adults with febrile illness admitted to hospital with presumptive diagnosis:

65 met diagnostic laboratory criteria of scrub typhus;

10/65 had co-infections and were excluded.

Final participants: doxycycline (n = 31); tetracycline (n = 24).


Interventions(1) Doxycycline 200 mg single dose.

(2) Tetracycline 500 mg 6 hourly for 7 days.

No clinical improvement at 48 hours: clinicians given discretion to give any additional treatment.


OutcomesAfebrile in 48 hours.

Disappearance of symptoms: headache; cough; and malaise.

Side effects.


NotesDiagnostic laboratory criteria either:

(1) isolation of Rickettsia tsutsugamushi;

(2) 4-fold rise in indirect microimmunofluorescent antibody titre, to at least 1:200;

(3) a static titre of 1:800 or more;

(4) 4-fold rise of Weil-Felix (OX-K) titre to at least 1:200.

Follow up: 14 days.

Study location: Mentakab district hospital, Malaysia.


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Adequate sequence generation?Unclear"volunteers were randomly assigned"

Allocation concealment?Unclearnot mentioned

Blinding?
All outcomes
Unclearnot mentioned

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
No10/65 (>10%)

Free of selective reporting?YesMain outcome reported





Kim 2004

MethodsRandomized controlled trial


Participants99 adult participants diagnosed mild scrub typhus on the basis of clinical criteria. Four participants who confirmed to have combined infection with other disease, one participant who developed severe vomiting and one participant who was given the wrong dose of medication were excluded.

Final participants: azithromycin (n = 47); doxycycline (n = 46)


Interventions(1) Azithromycin 500 mg single dose.

(2) Doxycycline 200 mg/day for 7 days.


OutcomesTime to defervescence

Cure

Failure

Adverse drug effects.


NotesDiagnostic laboratory criteria either:

(1) A titre of indirect immunofluorescent test IgM antibody 1:10 or higher

(2) a 4-fold rising titre of antibody between paired sera.

Follow up: 30 days

Study location: Chung-nam National University Hospital, Republic of Korea.


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Adequate sequence generation?Yes"the enrolled patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated random sequences"

Allocation concealment?Unclearnot mentioned

Blinding?
All outcomes
Noopen-label

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Yes93/99(<10%)

Free of selective reporting?YesMain outcome reported





Kim 2007

MethodsQuasi-randomized controlled trial


Participants95 adults with a fever higher than 37.5˚C, the concurrent presence of eschar or maculopapular skin rash, and the clear presence of more than two symptoms such as headache, malaise, myalgia, coughing, nausea, and abdominal discomfort were enrolled.

3/95 had concurrent diseases and was excluded.

Final participants: doxycycline (n = 45); telithromycin (n = 47).

76/92 participants met diagnostic laboratory criteria of scrub typhus.


Interventions(1) Doxycycline 200 mg daily for 5 days.

(2) Telithromycin 800 mg daily for 5 days.


OutcomesFever clearance time.

Cure.

Failure.

Relapse.

Toxicity and adverse events.


NotesDiagnostic laboratory criteria either:

(1) A titre of a single indirect immunofluorescent specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) > 1:80

(2) The immunofluorescent antibody assay titre increased more than four times.

Follow up: 4 weeks.

Study location: Chosun University Hospital in Gwangju, Korea or one of two community-based affiliated hospitals, southwestern Korea.


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Adequate sequence generation?No"eligible patients were randomly allocated by last digit of a resident registration number"

Allocation concealment?Unclearnot mentioned

Blinding?
All outcomes
Noopen-label

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Yes92/92

Free of selective reporting?Yesmain outcome reported





Phimda 2007

MethodsRandomized controlled trial


Participants296 adults with suspected leptospirosis or scrub typhus, that is, patients with acute fever (oral temperature ≥38.0˚C for < 15 days) in the absence of an obvious focus of infection were randomised.

57 patients met diagnostic laboratory criteria of scrub typhus.

Final participants of diagnostic scrub typhus: doxycycline (n = 27); azithromycin (n = 30).


Interventions(1) Doxycycline 200 mg followed by 100 mg twice daily for 7 days.

(2) Azithromycin 1 g followed by 500 mg once daily for 2 days.


OutcomesCure.

Failure.

Defervescence.

Adverse events.


NotesDiagnostic laboratory criteria either:

(1) A fourfold or greater rise in immunofluorescent assay titres between paired serum samples.

(2) A titre of at least 1:400 or greater on a single specimen.

Follow up: median duration was 15 days.

Study location: four hospitals in Thailand.


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Adequate sequence generation?Yesby computer-generated random sequences

Allocation concealment?Yescentral randomisation, sealed, opaque envelope

Blinding?
All outcomes
Noopen

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Yes296/296

Free of selective reporting?Yesmain outcome reported





Sheehy 1973

MethodsRandomized controlled trial


Participants63 adults with symptoms of scrub typhus admitted to hospital; 3/63 had coexistent malaria and were excluded.

Final participants: chloramphenicol (n = 30)tetracycline (n = 30).


Interventions(1) Chloramphenicol 3 g daily for 3 days.

(2) Tetracycline 2 g daily for 3 days.

Continuation of treatment beyond 3 days was decided by physicians.


OutcomesDuration of fever.

Afebrile in 48 hours.

Relapse.


NotesDiagnosis was based on clinical findings, a rising titre of Weil-Felix (OX-K) test.

Follow up: 3 weeks.

Study location: Two military hospitals in Vietnam.


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Adequate sequence generation?Unclear"patients were evacuated at random to one of the two supporting units"

Allocation concealment?Unclearnot mentioned

Blinding?
All outcomes
Unclearnot mentioned

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Yes60/63 (<10%)

Free of selective reporting?Yesmain outcome reported





Song 1995

MethodsRandomized controlled trial


Participants129 adults with clinical findings of acute high fever, rash, and eschar were enrolled.

13/129 were excluded as indirect micro-immunofluorescent antibody titres did not meet the criteria.

Final participants: doxycycline (n = 66); tetracycline (n = 50).


Interventions(1) Doxycycline 100 mg every 12 hours for 3 days.

(2) Tetracycline 500 mg every 6 hours for 7 days.


OutcomesTreatment failure.

Relapse.

Duration of fever.

Disappearance of symptoms: fever; headache; and malaise.

Toxicity and side effects.


NotesDiagnostic laboratory criteria either:

(1) A titre of micro-immunofluorescent, immunoglobulin G antibody > 1:80

(2) a 4-fold rising titre between paired sera.

Follow up: 4 weeks.

Study location: 8 branch hospitals of the Asian Foundation in Korea.


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Adequate sequence generation?Yesby computer-generated random orders

Allocation concealment?Nocentral randomisation but not remote from trial location

Blinding?
All outcomes
Nonon blinded

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
No116/129(>10%)

Free of selective reporting?Yesmain outcome reported





Watt 2000

MethodsRandomized controlled trial


Participants126 adults diagnosed mild scrub typhus with seropositive by a dot-blot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) rapid test.

Participants were excluded when the indirect immunoperoxidase test did not meet the criteria, or co-infections or side effects occurred.

Final participants: doxycycline (n = 28);
standard rifampicin dose (600 mg/day) (n = 26)
high rifampicin dose (900 mg/day) (n = 24).


Interventions(1) Doxycycline 200 mg followed by 100 mg twice daily for 7 days.

(2) Rifampicin 300 mg twice daily for 7 days.

(3) Combination of doxycycline and rifampicin.

This regimen was withdrawn and replaced with high dose rifampicin (450 mg twice daily) after one year period of the study.


OutcomesAfebrile in 48 hours.

Median fever clearance time.

Relapse.

Side effects.


NotesDiagnostic laboratory criteria was indirect immunoperoxidase test, immunoglobulin M titre >1:400 or immunoglobulin G >1600.

Study location: Chiangrai regional hospital, Thailand.


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Adequate sequence generation?Unclear"patients were randomly assigned"

Allocation concealment?Unclearnot mentioned

Blinding?
All outcomes
Unclearnot mentioned

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
No78/126(>10%)

Free of selective reporting?Yesmain outcome reported



 
Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

StudyReason for exclusion

Olson 1980A randomized double blind study estimated the effect of 200 mg doxycycline weekly on the prevention of scrub typhus in hyperendemic area. The trial, conducted in military subjects, compared the incidence rate of scrub typhus between the doxycycline and placebo group.

Twartz 1982A randomized double blind study conducted in 20 volunteers assigned to receive either 200 mg doxycycline weekly or placebo before exposure to Leptotrombidium fletcheri chiggers infected with Rickettsia tsutsugamushi and continued for 6 weeks after exposure. The incidence of scrub typhus was compared between groups.



 
Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]
IRB043-31

Trial name or titleControlled Trial: 5-Day Course of Rifampin Versus Doxycycline for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Scrub Typhus

MethodsRandomized controlled trial

ParticipantsInclusion criteria:

- Adults aged 18 years or older
- A fever of higher than 37.5˚C
- The concurrent presence of eschar or a maculopapular skin rash; and the clear presence of more than two symptoms such as headache, malaise, myalgia, coughing, nausea and abdominal discomfort.
- Patients were hospitalised at Chosun University Hospitalin Kwangju, Korea or one of its two community-based affiliated hospitals which are all located in southwestern Korea between 2006 and 2009.

Exclusion criteria:

- An inability to take oral medications
- Pregnancy
- Hypersensitivity to the trial drugs
- Previous drug therapy with potential anti-rickettsial activity (e.g., rifampicin, chloramphenicol, macrolides, fluoroquinolones or tetracyclines) within 48 h prior to admission
- Severe scrub typhus (shock requiring vasopressor therapy for more than one hour
- A stuporous or comatose level of consciousness
- Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation or renal failure requiring immediate dialysis) (4, 10).
- For the differential diagnosis of scrub typhus from other diseases with similar symptoms (e.g., murine typhus, leptospirosis, hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus), patients underwent diagnostic tests. We thus excluded patients with concurrent infections who had the risk of causing different outcomes.

Interventions1. 5-day rifampin therapy

2. 5-day doxycycline therapy

Outcomes1. the fever clearance time.

2. Cure

3. Failure

4. Relapse

Starting dateSeptember 2006

Expected completion: December 2009

Contact informationProf. Dong-Min Kim
(drongkim@chosun.ac.kr), Chosun University Hospital, Gwang-Joo, Jeollanamdo

NotesLocation: Chosun University Hospital, or one of its two community-based affiliated hospitals which are all located in southwestern Korea

Study ID numbers: IRB043-31





ISRCTN47812566

Trial name or titleOral doxycycline versus oral azithromycin in the treatment of Scruband Murine Typhus in Laos

MethodsRandomized controlled trial

ParticipantsInclusion criteria:

1. Adult (greater than 15 years) non-pregnant patients with suspected typhus. Suspected typhus will be defined as undifferentiated fever (aural temperature greater than 37.5C), with or without an eschar, with a positive scrub typhus Lateral Flow IgM result or a murine typhus IgM Dip-S-Ticks result
2. Written informed consent to the study
3. Able to stay in hospital for the duration of the treatment (up to 7 days) and high likelihood of completing at least 4 weeks follow up
4. Able to take oral medication
5. A negative urinary pregnancy test for all women of child bearing age

6. None of the exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

1. Known hypersensitivity to tetracycline, doxycycline or azithromycin
2. Administration of chloramphenicol, doxycycline, tetracycline, fluoroquinolones or azithromycin during the preceding week
3. Pregnancy or breast feeding
4. Contraindications to doxycycline: severe hepatic impairment, known systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
5. Contraindications to azithromycin: severe hepatic impairment
6. Severe typhus defined as:
6.1. Reduced level of consciousness
6.2. Clinical jaundice
6.3. Shock (blood pressure [BP] systolic less than 80 mmHg)
6.4. Vomiting sufficient to disallow the use of oral medication
6.5. Clinical or radiological evidence for lung involvement
6.6. Clinical evidence for meningitis/encephalitis or the need for a lumbar puncture (LP)

6.7. Any other syndrome which in the opinion of the admitting doctor constitutes severe typhus (reason must be stated)

Interventions1. Oral doxycycline 100 mg every 12 hours for 7 days (after a 200 mg loading dose)
2. Doxycycline 100 mg every 12 hours for 3 days (after a 200 mg loading dose)
3. Oral azithromycin 500 mg on day 1 and then 250 mg every 24 hours for 2 more days

Outcomes1. Fever clearance times
2. Frequencies of treatment failure
3. Frequencies of relapse

4. Treatment failure frequency
5. Relapse frequency

Starting date4 August 2003

End of follow-up date: 31 December 2009

Contact informationDr Paul Newton

(paul@tropmedres.ac), Ministry of Health, Mahosot Hospital, Mahosot Road, Vientiane, Laos

NotesLocation: Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Laos

Registration number: ISRCTN47812566

Sources of funding: The Wellcome Trust (UK) (grant ref: 066828)



 
Comparison 1. Tetracycline vs chloramphenicol

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Febrile after 48 hours1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 2 Relapse1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 
Comparison 2. Doxycycline vs tetracycline

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Febrile after 48 hours1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 2 Relapse1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 3 Duration of fever1Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 4 Treatment failure1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 
Comparison 3. Rifampicin vs doxycycline

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Febrile after 48 hours1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 2 Relapse1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 
Comparison 4. High rifampicin dose vs standard rifampicin dose

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Febrile after 48 hours1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 2 Relapse1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 
Comparison 5. Doxycycline vs standard rifampicin dose vs high rifampicin dose

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Number of participants febrile after 48 hoursOther dataNo numeric data

 2 Median fever clearance time (hours)Other dataNo numeric data

 3 Number of participants with a relapseOther dataNo numeric data

 
Analysis 5.1 Comparison 5 Doxycycline vs standard rifampicin dose vs high rifampicin dose, Outcome 1 Number of participants febrile after 48 hours.
Number of participants febrile after 48 hours

StudyDoxycyclineStandard rifampicinHigh rifampicin

Watt 200015/286/265/24

 
Analysis 5.2 Comparison 5 Doxycycline vs standard rifampicin dose vs high rifampicin dose, Outcome 2 Median fever clearance time (hours).
Median fever clearance time (hours)

StudyDoxycyclineStandard rifampicinHigh rifampicin

Watt 200052 (range 4 to 108)27.5 (4 to 84)22.5 (3 to 76)

 
Analysis 5.3 Comparison 5 Doxycycline vs standard rifampicin dose vs high rifampicin dose, Outcome 3 Number of participants with a relapse.
Number of participants with a relapse

StudyDoxycyclineStandard rifampicinHigh rifampicin

Watt 20002/280/260/24

 
Comparison 6. Azithromycin vs doxycycline

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Febrile after 48 hours2150Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI)0.99 [0.30, 3.27]

 2 Relapse2150Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

 3 Gastrointestinal side effect1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 4 Treatment failure1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 
Comparison 7. Telithromycin vs doxycycline

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Duration of fever1Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 2 Failure1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 3 Relapse1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 4 Adverse effects1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 5 Gastrointestinal side effects1Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

 
Table 1. Scrub typhus treatment: Observational studies using serology in diagnosis

Source, yearCountryType of studyParticipantsTreatmentOutcomesResults

Sirisanthana 1989ThailandCase series in Chiang Mai
(n = 25).
Children with scrub typhus, diagnosed by clinical symptoms (15/25 confirmed by Weil Felix test (OX-K titre) of 1:160 or more, or 4-fold rise of titre).Tetracycline (n=16) or chloramphenical (n=9) for 7 to 10 days.Fever clearance time; relapse.Mean fever clearance 38 hours; 2 had relapse after one week discontinuation of antibiotic.

Supparatpinyo 1990ThailandCase series in Chiang Mai
(n = 42).
Adults with mild to moderate severe disease, diagnosed by eschar or a rise of Weil Felix (OX-K titre) of 1:320 or more, or 4-fold rise.Doxycycline 200 mg single dose.Afebrile in 72 hours; relapse.37/42 (88%) afebrile in 72 hours, no relapse in a month after treatment (follow-up rate 52%).

Watt 1996ThailandCase series in Chiangrai (n = 12) and Maesot
(n = 7).
Adults with mild disease with indirect immunoperoxidase test; IgM 1 in 400 or greater and/or IgG 1 in 1600 or greater.Doxycycline 200 mg stat; then 100 mg 12 hourly for 7 days.Fever clearance time.Median fever clearance 80 hours (Chiang Rai); 30 hours (Maesot).

 
Table 2. Detailed search strategies

Search setCIDG SRaCENTRALMEDLINEbEMBASEbLILACSb

1Scrub typhusSCRUB TYPHUSSCRUB TYPHUSSCRUB TYPHUSScrub typhus

2Rickettsia tsutsugamushiScrub typhus [ti, ab]Scrub typhus [ti, ab]Scrub typhus [ti, ab]Rickettsia tsutsugamushi

3Orientia tsutsugamushiOrientia tsutsugamushi [ti, ab]Orientia tsutsugamushi [ti, ab]Orientia tsutsugamushi [ti, ab]Orientia tsutsugamushi

41 or 2 or 3Rickettsia tsutsugamushi [ti, ab]Rickettsia tsutsugamushi [ti, ab]Rickettsia tsutsugamushi [ti, ab]1 or 2 or 3

5 ORIENTIA TSUTSUGAMUSHIORIENTIA TSUTSUGAMUSHIORIENTIA TSUTSUGAMUSHI 

6 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 51 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 51 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 

7  Limit 6 to HumansLimit 6 to Human 

 aCochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register
b Search terms used in combination with the search strategy for retrieving trials developed by The Cochrane Collaboration (Lefebvre 2008); Upper case: MeSH or EMTREE heading; Lower case: free text term.
 
Table 3. Risk of bias assessment

TrialSequenceConcealmentBlindingParticipants

TrialGeneration of allocation sequenceAllocation concealmentBlindingInclusion of all randomized participants

Sheehy 1973UnclearUnclearUnclearAdequate(60/63)

Brown 1978UnclearUnclearUnclearInadequate (55/65)

Song 1995AdequateInadequateInadequate ("non blinded")Inadequate (116/129)

Watt 2000UnclearUnclearUnclearInadequate (78/126)

Kim 2004AdequateUnclearInadequate (open-label)Adequate (93/99)

Kim 2007InadequateUnclearInadequateAdequate (92/92)

Phimda 2007AdequateAdequateInadequate(open)Adequate (296/296)