Bonding of orthodontic brackets to teeth is important to enable effective and efficient treatment with fixed appliances. The problem is bracket failure during treatment which increases operator chairside time and lengthens treatment time. A prolonged treatment is likely to increase the oral health risks of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances one of which is irreversible enamel decalcification.
To evaluate the effectiveness of different orthodontic adhesives for bonding.
Electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE.
Date of most recent searches: August 2002 (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2002, Issue 2).
Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing two different adhesive groups. Participants were patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. The interventions were adhesives that bonded stainless steel brackets to all teeth except the molars. The primary outcome was debond or bracket failure.
Data collection and analysis
Data were recorded on decalcification as a secondary outcome, if present. Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were extracted in duplicate by pairs of review authors (Nicky Mandall (NM) and Rye Mattick (CRM); Declan Millett (DTM) and Joy Hickman (JH2)). Since the data were not presented in a form that was amenable to meta-analysis, the results of the review are presented in narrative form only.
Three trials satisfied the inclusion criteria. A chemical cured composite was compared with a light cured composite (one trial), a conventional glass ionomer cement (one trial) and a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) (one trial). The quality of the trial reports was generally poor.
It is difficult to draw any conclusions from this review, however, suggestions are made for methods of improving future research involving orthodontic adhesives.
電子資料庫：主要由Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register、 the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)、 MEDLINE及EMBASE.找最近期的資料: 2002年8月 (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002)
依據以下的納入標準搜尋：以隨機受控性試驗(randomised controlled trials)、臨床受控性試驗(controlled clinical trials)來比較兩種黏著劑者，參與的病人必須佩戴固定式矯正裝置，黏著劑用來固定除了大臼齒區外的不鏽鋼拖架，而主要結果為矯正器脫落或失敗。
此翻譯計畫由臺灣國家衛生研究院(National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan)統籌。