This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (15 APR 2009)

Intervention Review

Physical training for cystic fibrosis

  1. J Bradley,
  2. F Moran

Editorial Group: Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group

Published Online: 17 OCT 2007

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002768

How to Cite

Bradley J, Moran F. Physical training for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002768. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002768.

Author Information

*Dr Judy Bradley, Reader in Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Research Institute School, University of Ulster and Belfast City Hospital, University of Ulster, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, BT37 0QB, UK. jm.bradley@ulster.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 17 OCT 2007

SEARCH

This is not the most recent version of the article.View current version (15 Apr 2009)

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Synopsis

Background

Physical training may form an important part of the care package for people with cystic fibrosis.

Objectives

To determine whether a prescribed regimen of physical training produces improvement or prevents deterioration in physiological and clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis compared to no training.

Search strategy

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.

Date of the most recent search: December 2004.

Selection criteria

All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials in which a prescribed regimen of physical training is compared to no physical training in people with cystic fibrosis.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed methodological quality and extracted data.

Main results

Of the 22 studies identified, 7 studies which included 231 participants, met the inclusion criteria. This review does provide some limited evidence from both short- and long-term studies that aerobic or anaerobic physical training has a positive effect on primary outcomes (exercise capacity, strength and lung function) but improvements are not consistent between studies.

Authors' conclusions

Conclusions about the efficacy of physical training in cystic fibrosis are limited by the small size, short duration and incomplete reporting of most of the studies included in this review. Physical training is already part of the care package offered to most people with cystic fibrosis and there is a lack of evidence to actively discourage this. The benefits obtained from including physical training in a package of care may be influenced by the type of training programme. Further research is needed to assess comprehensively the benefits of exercise programmes in people with cystic fibrosis and the relative benefits of the addition of aerobic versus anaerobic versus a combination of both types of physical training to the care of people with cystic fibrosis.

 

Synopsis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Synopsis

Plain language summary

Physical training programmes combining aerobic and anaerobic training may improve exercise capacity for people with cystic fibrosis and have some other health benefits

The progress of lung disease in cystic fibrosis leads to abnormal breathing during exercise. This contributes to breathlessness and is a limitation to people exercising, which has health and body image consequences. Physical training is a programme of regular vigorous activity designed to improve physical, heart and/or muscle strength. The review of studies found some benefit from short and longer periods of training and that these improvements were maintained after the training had stopped. The type of training (aerobic or anaerobic) may influence outcomes.