Intervention Review

Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation

  1. Jeffrey J Perry1,*,
  2. Jacques S Lee2,
  3. Victoria AH Sillberg1,
  4. George A Wells3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Anaesthesia Group

Published Online: 23 APR 2008

Assessed as up-to-date: 20 AUG 2007

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788.pub2

Database Title

Additional Information

How to Cite

Perry JJ, Lee JS, Sillberg VAH, Wells GA. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002788. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    The Ottawa Hospital, Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  2. 2

    Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Emergency Department, Toronto, Canada

  3. 3

    University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Cardiovascular Research Reference Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

*Jeffrey J Perry, Clinical Epidemiology Programme, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, F6 Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada. jperry@ohri.ca.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed)
  2. Published Online: 23 APR 2008

SEARCH

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (60K)Standard (408K)Full (583K)

  1. Current Version

    Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation

    Jeffrey J Perry, Jacques S Lee, Victoria AH Sillberg and George A Wells

    Article first published online: 23 APR 2008 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation

    J Perry, J Lee and G Wells

    Article first published online: 23 JAN 2008 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (60K)Standard (408K)Full (583K)