Intervention Review

Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation

  1. Jeffrey J Perry1,*,
  2. Jacques S Lee2,
  3. Victoria AH Sillberg1,
  4. George A Wells3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Anaesthesia Group

Published Online: 23 APR 2008

Assessed as up-to-date: 20 AUG 2007

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788.pub2


How to Cite

Perry JJ, Lee JS, Sillberg VAH, Wells GA. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002788. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    The Ottawa Hospital, Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  2. 2

    Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Emergency Department, Toronto, Canada

  3. 3

    University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Cardiovascular Research Reference Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

*Jeffrey J Perry, Clinical Epidemiology Programme, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, F6 Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada. jperry@ohri.ca.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed)
  2. Published Online: 23 APR 2008

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation

    Jeffrey J Perry, Jacques S Lee, Victoria AH Sillberg and George A Wells

    Article first published online: 23 APR 2008 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation

    J Perry, J Lee and G Wells

    Article first published online: 20 JAN 2003 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788