Get access

Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation

  • Review
  • Intervention

Authors

  • Eal Whan Park,

    Corresponding author
    1. Medical College of Dankook University, Department of Family Medicine, Cheonan, Chungnam, Korea, South
    • Eal Whan Park, Department of Family Medicine, Medical College of Dankook University, 16-5 Anseo-Dong, Cheonan, Chungnam, 330-715, Korea, South. ewpark@kornet.net.

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Fred G Tudiver,

    1. East Tennesse State University, Department of Family Medicine, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Thomas Campbell

    1. University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Family Medicine and Psychiatry, Rochester, New York, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Background

While many cessation programmes are available to assist smokers in quitting, research suggests that partner involvement may encourage long-term abstinence.

Objectives

The purpose of this review was to determine if an intervention to enhance partner support helps smoking cessation when added as an adjunct to a smoking cessation programme, and to estimate the size of any effect.

Search methods

For the most recent update, the search was limited to the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialized Register. This was searched in December 2011. The Specialized Register includes reports of controlled trials of smoking cessation identified from electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to Issue 4, 2011, MEDLINE to update 20110826, EMBASE to 2011 week 33, PsycINFO to 20110822 and Web of Science. The search terms used were smoking (prevention, control, therapy), smoking cessation, and support (family, marriage, spouse, partner, sexual partner, buddy, friend, co-habitees and co-worker).

Selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials of smoking cessation interventions that compared an intervention that included a partner support component with an otherwise identical intervention and reported follow-up of six months or longer.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently identified the included studies and extracted data using a structured form. A third author was consulted to aid in the resolution of discrepancies. Abstinence, biochemically validated if possible, was the primary outcome measure and was extracted at two post-treatment intervals: six to nine months and 12 months or greater. Partner Interaction Questionnaire and Support Provided Measure scores were also analysed to assess partner support. A fixed-effect model was used to pool relative risks from each study and estimate a summary effect.

Main results

A total of 57 articles were identified for this review. Twelve articles (13 studies, > 2000 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The definition of partner varied between studies. All studies gave self-reported smoking cessation rates, but there was limited biochemical validation of abstinence. The pooled risk ratio for self-reported abstinence was 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.15) at six to nine months and 1.04 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.24) at 12 months or more post-treatment. Of the eight studies that measured partner support at follow-up, only two studies reported a significant increase in partner support in the intervention groups. One study reported a significant increase in partner support in the intervention group, but smokers' reports of partner support received did not differ significantly in this study.

Authors' conclusions

In this review of randomized controlled trials of interventions designed to enhance partner support for smokers in cessation programmes, we failed to detect an increase in quit rates. Limited data from several of the trials suggest that these interventions also did not increase partner support. No conclusions can be made about the impact of partner support on smoking cessation. Additional studies with larger samples are needed to adequately explore the effects of partner support interventions for smoking cessation.

Plain language summary

Are there ways to help partners to give more effective support to people who are trying to quit smoking

Smokers trying to quit who get support from partners and other people are more likely to quit. Interventions intended to improve the support received from partners have not been shown to increase long-term quit rates compared to smoking cessation programmes without a partner support component. The interventions may not have successfully changed the support provided.

Laički sažetak

Kako pomoći partnerima pušača da pruže bolju podršku osobama koje pokušavaju prestati pušiti

Pušači koji pokušavaju prestati pušiti,i u tome imaju podršku od svojih partnera i drugih ljudi, imaju veću vjerojatnost prestanka pušenja. Intervencije namijenjene poboljšanju podrške primljene od partnera nisu pokazale povećanje stopa dugoročnih prekida u usporedbi s programima za prestanak pušenja koji ne uključuju komponentu partnerove podrške. Intervencije možda nisu uspješno poboljšale pruženu podršku.

Bilješke prijevoda

Cochrane Hrvatska
Prevela: Katarina Vučić
Ovaj sažetak preveden je u okviru volonterskog projekta prevođenja Cochrane sažetaka. Uključite se u projekt i pomozite nam u prevođenju brojnih preostalih Cochrane sažetaka koji su još uvijek dostupni samo na engleskom jeziku. Kontakt: cochrane_croatia@mefst.hr

Streszczenie prostym językiem

Czy można sprawić, aby partnerzy osób próbujących rzucić palenie udzielali im skuteczniejszego wsparcia?

Wsparcie ze strony partnera lub innych osób zwiększa szanse na skuteczne rzucenie palenia. Nie wykazano, aby interwencje mające zwiększyć wsparcie uzyskiwane od partnera poprawiały szanse na niepalenie w dłuższym terminie, w porównaniu z programami antynikotynowymi nie obejmującymi elementu wsparcia ze strony partnera. Możliwe, że interwencje te nie zmieniły skutecznie poziomu oferowanego wsparcia.

Uwagi do tłumaczenia

Tłum. Bartłomiej Matulewicz, red. Łukasz Strzeszyński

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary