Intervention Review

High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term

  1. Antonio G De Paoli1,*,
  2. Reese H Clark2,
  3. Tushar Bhuta3,
  4. David J Henderson-Smart4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Neonatal Group

Published Online: 8 JUL 2009

Assessed as up-to-date: 12 FEB 2009

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002974.pub2


How to Cite

De Paoli AG, Clark RH, Bhuta T, Henderson-Smart DJ. High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002974. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002974.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Royal Hobart Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

  2. 2

    Pediatrix Medical Group Inc., Neonatal, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA

  3. 3

    Royal North Shore Hospital, Department of Neonatal Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  4. 4

    Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, (Deceased) Central Clinical School, Sydney, Australia

*Antonio G De Paoli, Department of Paediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, GPO Box 1061, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia. antonio.depaoli@dhhs.tas.gov.au.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 8 JUL 2009

SEARCH