This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (8 SEP 2011)

Intervention Review

Primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people

  1. David Foxcroft1,*,
  2. Diana Ireland2,
  3. Geoff Lowe3,
  4. Rosie Breen2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group

Published Online: 16 JUL 2008

Assessed as up-to-date: 28 MAY 2002

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003024

Database Title

Additional Information

How to Cite

Foxcroft D, Ireland D, Lowe G, Breen R. Primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003024. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003024.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Oxford Brookes University, School of Health and Social Care, Oxford, England, UK

  2. 2

    Oxford Brookes University, School of Health Care, Oxford, UK

  3. 3

    University of Hull, Department of Psychology, Hull, UK

*David Foxcroft, School of Health and Social Care, Oxford Brookes University, Marston Road, Jack Straws Lane, Marston, Oxford, England, OX3 0FL, UK. david.foxcroft@brookes.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 16 JUL 2008

SEARCH

ARTICLE TOOLS

This is not the most recent version of the article.View current version (08 Sep 2011)

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (58K)Standard (641K)Full (687K)
 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Background

Alcohol misuse is a cause of concern for health services, policy makers, prevention workers, the criminal justice system, youth workers, teachers and parents.

Objectives

1. To identify and summarize rigorous evaluations of psychosocial and educational interventions aimed at the primary prevention of alcohol misuse by young people.
2. To assess the effectiveness of primary prevention interventions over the longer-term (> 3 years).

Search strategy

Databases searched (no time limits): Project CORK, BIDS, PSYCLIT, ERIC, ASSIA, MEDLINE, FAMILY-RESOURCES-DATABASE, HEALTH-PERIODICALS-DATABASE, EMBASE, BIDS, Dissertation-Abstracts, SIGLE, DRUG-INFO, SOMED, Social-Work-Abstracts, National-Clearinghouse-on-Alcohol-and-Drug-Information, Mental-Health-Abstracts, DRUG-database, ETOH (all searched Feb-June 2002).

Selection criteria

1. randomised controlled and non-randomised controlled and interrupted time series designs.
2. educational and psychosocial primary prevention interventions for young people up to 25 years old.
3. alcohol-specific or generic (drugs; lifestyle) interventions providing alcohol outcomes reported.
4. alcohol outcomes: alcohol use, age of alcohol initiation, drinking 5+ drinks on any one occasion, drunkeness, alcohol related violence, alcohol related crime, alcohol related risky behaviour.

Data collection and analysis

Stage 1: All papers screened by one reviewer against inclusion criteria.
Stage 2: For those papers that passed Stage 1, key information was extracted from each paper by 2-3 reviewers.

Main results

20 of the 56 studies included showed evidence of ineffectiveness. No firm conclusions about the effectiveness of prevention interventions in the short- and medium-term were possible. Over the longer-term, the Strengthening Families Program (SFP) showed promise as an effective prevention intervention. The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) for the SFP over 4 years for three alcohol initiation behaviours (alcohol use, alcohol use without permission and first drunkeness) was 9 (for all three behaviours). One study also highlighted the potential value of culturally focused skills training over the longer-term (NNT=17 over three-and-a-half years for 4+ drinks in the last week).

Authors' conclusions

1. Research into important outcome variables needs to be undertaken.
2. Methodology of evaluations needs to be improved.
3. The Strengthening Families Programme needs to be evaluated on a larger scale and in different settings.
4. Culturally-focused interventions require further development and rigorous evaluation.
5. An international register of alcohol and drug misuse prevention interventions should be established and criteria agreed for rating prevention intervention in terms of safety, efficacy and effectiveness.

 

Plain language summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people

Many studies that have evaluated educational and psychosocial prevention programmes were considered and appraised in this systematic review. A number of programmes showed evidence of ineffectiveness. Those that reported longer-term evaluations (over three years follow-up) were examined in more detail and several promising studies were re-analysed to provide a better indication of the potential impact of the prevention programme. On the basis of this re-analysis, the Strengthening Families Programme (SFP) in particular but also culturally focused skills training appear to offer promise. However, all of the studies included in the review showed some methodological weaknesses and it is therefore necessary to replicate these studies with more robust design and analysis, and across different settings.

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (58K)Standard (641K)Full (687K)