This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (20 JAN 2010)
Intervention Review
Advanced trauma life support training for ambulance crews
Editorial Group: Cochrane Injuries Group
Published Online: 7 OCT 2009
Assessed as up-to-date: 30 JUN 2006
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003109
Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Database Title
Additional Information
How to Cite
Sethi DD, Kwan I, Kelly AM, Roberts IG, Bunn F. Advanced trauma life support training for ambulance crews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003109. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003109.
Publication History
- Publication Status: Unchanged
- Published Online: 7 OCT 2009
This is not the most recent version of the article.View current version (20 Jan 2010)
Abstract
Background
There is an increasing global burden of disease from injuries. Models of trauma care initially developed in high-income countries are also being adopted in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Amongst these, ambulance crews with Advanced Life Support (ALS) training are being promoted in LMIC as a strategy for improving outcomes for victims of trauma. However there is controversy as to the effectiveness of this health service intervention, and the evidence has yet to be rigorously appraised.
Objectives
To quantify the effectiveness of ambulance crews with ALS training versus crews with any other level of training in reducing mortality and morbidity in trauma patients.
Search strategy
We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library issue 2, 2006), the Injuries Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and the National Research Register. We checked references of background papers and contacted authors to identify additional published and unpublished data. The search was last updated in July 2006.
Selection criteria
Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials and controlled before-and-after studies comparing effectiveness of ambulance crews with ALS training versus crews with any other levels of training in reducing mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. Studies which compared crews staffed by physicians versus others were excluded.
Data collection and analysis
Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria to trial reports for inclusion and extracted data.
Main results
We found one randomised controlled trial from the original search (Nicholl 1998), which included 16 trauma cases. However, outcome data were added to the main non-randomised cohort in the analysis, and data on these 16 cases cannot be included in this review.
Authors' conclusions
In the absence of evidence of the effectiveness of advanced life support, strong argument could be made that it should not be promoted outside the context of a properly concealed and otherwise rigorously conducted randomised controlled trial.
Plain language summary
No evidence to show the effect of advanced trauma life support training for ambulance crews on people with trauma from injury
Injury is one of the top ten causes of death and disability worldwide. It results in an early loss of life for many young people and ongoing high medical care costs. Advanced Life Support (ALS) for ambulance officers is believed to have contributed to the reduced number of deaths from injury in countries where this service is available. ALS services are also being adapted for low and middle-income countries. The review of trials found there is no evidence to show the effect of ALS on people with trauma from injury. More research is needed.
