Intervention Review

Snoezelen for dementia

  1. Jenny CC Chung1,*,
  2. Claudia KY Lai2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group

Published Online: 21 OCT 2002

Assessed as up-to-date: 21 APR 2008

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003152

How to Cite

Chung JCC, Lai CKY. Snoezelen for dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003152. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003152.

Author Information

  1. 1

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Dept of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hung Hom, Kowloon, HONG KONG, China

  2. 2

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, School of Nursing, Hung Hom, Hong Kong

*Jenny CC Chung, Dept of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, HONG KONG, China. rsjchung@polyu.edu.hk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 21 OCT 2002

SEARCH

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Background

Snoezelen, multi-sensory stimulation, provides sensory stimuli to stimulate the primary senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste and smell, through the use of lighting effects, tactile surfaces, meditative music and the odour of relaxing essential oils. The rationale for this lies in the proposition that the provision of a sensory environment for people with dementia places fewer demands on their intellectual abilities but capitalizes on their residual sensorimotor abilities. The clinical application of snoezelen often varies in form, nature, principles and procedures. Such variations not only make the examination of the therapeutic values of snoezelen difficult, but also impede the clinical development of snoezelen in dementia care. A systematic review of evidence for the efficacy of snoezelen in the care of people with dementia is therefore needed to inform future clinical applications and research directions.

Objectives

To examine the clinical efficacy of snoezelen (or multisensory stimulation) for older people with dementia and their caregivers.

Search methods

The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG), The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and LILACS were searched on 23 March 2008 using the terms: snoezelen OR "multi-sensory*". The CDCIG Specialized Register contains records from all major health care databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS) as well as from many trials databases and grey literature sources.

The reviewers hand-searched PubMed and the ISI Web of Science.

Selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials in which snoezelen or multi-sensory programmes was used as an intervention for older people suffering from any forms of dementia.

Data collection and analysis

The two reviewers independently reviewed and assessed the quality of the trials.

Main results

Two new trials were included in this update. Baker 2003 was an expanded study of Baker 2001 reported in the previous version. Both Baker 2003 and van Weert 2005 examined the short-term and longer-term effects of snoezelen on behaviour, mood, and communication of people with moderate to severe dementia. The format of implementation was different in the two trials: one was session-based snoezelen programme (Baker 2003), whilst the other was a 24-hour integrated snoezelen care (van Weert 2005). Owing to the differences in study methodology, the results of the two trials were not pooled for analysis. The session-based snoezelen programme (Baker 2003) did not show any effects on behaviour, mood, cognition and communication / interaction in the short term (during or immediately after sessions) or longer term (at post-intervention or 1-month post-intervention follow-up). Likewise, the 24-hour integrated snoezelen care (van Weert 2005) failed to demonstrate any significant short-term and longer term effects on behaviour, mood and interaction.

Authors' conclusions

A more vigorous review methodology was adopted in this update. The study of Kragt 1997, reported in the previous version, was excluded because the snoezelen programme only consisted of three sessions, which was considered too brief for a therapeutic intervention. Two new trials were reviewed. Meta-analyses could not be performed because of the limited number of trials and different study methods of the available trials. Overall, there is no evidence showing the efficacy of snoezelen for dementia. There is a need for more reliable and sound research-based evidence to inform and justify the use of snoezelen in dementia care.

 

Plain language summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

No evidence of the efficacy of snoezelen or multi-sensory stimulation programmes for people with dementia

Snoezelen (or multi-sensory stimulation) has become a commonly used intervention to manage maladaptive behaviours and to promote positive mood of older people with dementia. Originally, two randomised clinical trials were available for this review. Some short-term benefits were documented in promoting adaptive behaviours in people with dementia during and immediately after their participation in the sessions. In this update, two new trials were included and revealed two different forms of applying snoezelen to dementia care. One is a session-based snoezelen programme while the other is a 24-hour integrated snoezelen care programme. Both trials did not show any significant effects on behaviour, interaction, and mood of people with dementia.