Intervention Review

Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception

  1. Paul O'Brien1,*,
  2. Caroline C Marfleet2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group

Published Online: 24 JAN 2005

Assessed as up-to-date: 12 NOV 2004

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003282.pub2


How to Cite

O'Brien P, Marfleet CC. Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003282. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003282.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Westminster Primary Care Trust, Raymede Clinic, Westside Contraceptive Services, London, UK

  2. 2

    Colchester, Essex, UK

*Paul O'Brien, Raymede Clinic, Westside Contraceptive Services, Westminster Primary Care Trust, Exmoor St, London, W10 6DZ, UK. paulobrien@nhs.net.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 24 JAN 2005

SEARCH